Core i5-8400T
VS
Core i7-4950HQ

Core i5-8400T vs Core i7-4950HQ

Intel

Core i5-8400T

6 Cores6 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2018
VS
Intel

Core i7-4950HQ

4 Cores8 Thrd47 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-8400T

#354
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200
109%
#355
Core i9-10900
MSRP: $483|Avg: $426
108%
#356
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
108%
#357
Core i9-10900K
MSRP: $499|Avg: $500
108%
#358
Celeron G4930
MSRP: $42|Avg: $57
108%
#359
Ryzen 7 2700E
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
107%
#360
Ryzen Embedded V2516
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
107%
#361
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2442
107%
#362
Core i9-14901E
MSRP: $557|Avg: $689
106%
#363
Celeron G5900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
106%
#364
Celeron G6900TE
MSRP: $53|Avg: $64
105%
#365
Core i5-8600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $213
104%
#366
Celeron G4950
MSRP: $52|Avg: $63
104%
#367
Core i9-10900E
MSRP: $488|Avg: $450
104%
#368
Core i7-9700KF
MSRP: $374|Avg: $333
103%
#369
Core i5-8400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $179
100%
#370
Athlon 240GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $110
100%
#371
Core 5 120UL
MSRP: $277|Avg: $270
94%
#372
Ryzen Embedded V3C14
MSRP: $305|Avg: $305
94%
#373
Core i7-9700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $276
93%
#374
Core i9-13900TE
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
90%
#375
Ryzen Embedded V2546
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
88%
#376
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
86%
#377
Core i3-9100HL
MSRP: $225|Avg: $100
83%
#378
Core i9-12900TE
MSRP: $494|Avg: $664
83%
#379
Core i9-9940X
MSRP: $1387|Avg: $850
80%
#380
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1836
79%
#381
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
78%
#382
Ryzen Embedded R2544
MSRP: $280|Avg: $280
73%
#383
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999
68%
#384
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
MSRP: $3990|Avg: $2850
68%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4950HQ

#64
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
97%
#224
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
396%
#225
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
390%
#226
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
358%
#227
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
357%
#228
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
354%
#230
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
341%
#231
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
327%
#232
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
327%
#233
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
318%
#236
Core i7-4950HQ
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-8400T (2018) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2666, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i5-8400TCore i7-4950HQ
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($179)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Coffee Lake (2017−2019) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Crystalwell (2013−2014) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-4950HQ (2013) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i5-8400TCore i7-4950HQ
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($179)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-8400T and Core i7-4950HQ

Intel

Core i5-8400T

The Core i5-8400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 9 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 7,426 points. Launch price was $182.

Intel

Core i7-4950HQ

The Core i7-4950HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,405 points. Launch price was $657.

Processing Power

The Core i5-8400T packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Core i7-4950HQ offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-8400T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-8400T versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-4950HQ — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-4950HQ (base: 1.7 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-8400T uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-4950HQ uses Crystalwell (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-8400T scores 7,426 against the Core i7-4950HQ's 7,405 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i5-8400T. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 3,737 vs 3,317 (11.9% advantage for the Core i5-8400T). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,092 vs 842, a 25.9% lead for the Core i5-8400T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 3,816 vs 3,317 (14% advantage for the Core i5-8400T). L3 cache: 9 MB (total) on the Core i5-8400T vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4950HQ.

FeatureCore i5-8400TCore i7-4950HQ
Cores / Threads
6 / 6+50%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz
3.6 GHz+9%
Base Clock
1.7 GHz
2.4 GHz+41%
L3 Cache
9 MB (total)+13%
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Crystalwell (2013−2014)
PassMark
7,426
7,405
Cinebench R23 Multi
3,737+13%
3,317
Geekbench 6 Single
1,092+30%
842
Geekbench 6 Multi
3,816+15%
3,317
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-8400T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4950HQ uses BGA1364 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-8400T versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i7-4950HQ — the Core i5-8400T supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-8400T supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H310,B360,H370,Q370,Z370,Z390 (Core i5-8400T) and HM87,QM87 (Core i7-4950HQ).

FeatureCore i5-8400TCore i7-4950HQ
Socket
LGA1151
BGA1364
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666+33%
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB+300%
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Both support Yes virtualization. Both include integrated graphics UHD Graphics 630 (Core i5-8400T) and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 (Core i7-4950HQ) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCore i5-8400TCore i7-4950HQ
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 630
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
Yes
Yes