Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs Core i5-8400T

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs Core i5-8400T Performance Spectrum

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G

4 / 4

7,468

+0.6%

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Core i5-8400T

6 / 6

7,426

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs Core i5-8400T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs Core i5-8400T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G

2020

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $32 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).
✅Delivers 22.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.8 vs 40.8 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-8400T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 9 MB).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-8400T.

Core i5-8400T

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+125% larger total L3 cache (9 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Athlon Gold PRO 3150G.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,426 vs 7,468).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 40.8 vs 49.8 PassMark/$ ($182 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon Gold PRO 3150G better than Core i5-8400T?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-8400T is ahead with a 3.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon Gold PRO 3150G pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark. Core i5-8400T also has the bigger cache pool with 125% larger total L3 cache (9 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is the better buy right now. Athlon Gold PRO 3150G comes in $32 cheaper on MSRP at $150 MSRP versus $182 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i5-8400T is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 22.0% better value on MSRP (49.8 vs 40.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2018) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 6/6. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs Core i5-8400T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G

The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 7,468 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i5-8400T

The Core i5-8400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 9 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 7,426 points. Launch price was $182.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-8400T offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Core i5-8400T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-8400T — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G (base: 3.5 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Core i5-8400T uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G scores 7,468 against the Core i5-8400T's 7,426 — a 0.6% lead for the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs 9 MB (total) on the Core i5-8400T.

Feature	Athlon Gold PRO 3150G	Core i5-8400T
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	6 / 6+50%
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+18%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+106%	1.7 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	9 MB (total)+125%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	12 nm-14%	14 nm
Architecture	Picasso (2019−2022)	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
PassMark	7,468	7,426
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	3,737
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,092
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	3,816

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-8400T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-8400T — the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G supports 10% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-8400T supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (Athlon Gold PRO 3150G) vs 16 (Core i5-8400T) — the Core i5-8400T offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM4 (Athlon Gold PRO 3150G) and H310,B360,H370,Q370,Z370,Z390 (Core i5-8400T).

Feature	Athlon Gold PRO 3150G	Core i5-8400T
Socket	AM4	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2933+10%	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	128 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	8	16+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon Gold PRO 3150G) / Yes (Core i5-8400T). Both include integrated graphics — AMD Radeon Vega 3 (Athlon Gold PRO 3150G) and UHD Graphics 630 (Core i5-8400T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Athlon Gold PRO 3150G	Core i5-8400T
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	AMD Radeon Vega 3	UHD Graphics 630
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	Yes

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G was priced at $150, while the Core i5-8400T came in at $182. On launch pricing ($150 vs $182), Athlon Gold PRO 3150G was $32 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G delivers 49.8 pts/$ vs 40.8 pts/$ for the Core i5-8400T — making the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G the 19.8% better value option.

Feature	Athlon Gold PRO 3150G	Core i5-8400T
MSRP	$150-18%	$182
Performance per Dollar	49.8+22%	40.8
Release Date	2020	2018

Search Athlon Gold PRO 3150G on Amazon

Search Core i5-8400T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.