Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs Xeon E5-2440 v2

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs Xeon E5-2440 v2 Performance Spectrum

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G

4 / 4

7,468

0.0%

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E5-2440 v2

8 / 16

7,473

+0.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs Xeon E5-2440 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs Xeon E5-2440 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Vega 3, while Xeon E5-2440 v2 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2440 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (7,468 vs 7,473).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2440 v2, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2440 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2440 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +31.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon Gold PRO 3150G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2440 v2 better than Athlon Gold PRO 3150G?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2440 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2440 v2 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 31.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2440 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2440 v2 is still the better call for a fresh build. Xeon E5-2440 v2 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 31.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon Gold PRO 3150G only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 7,468 PassMark with 4 cores and 4 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs Xeon E5-2440 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G

The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 7,468 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2440 v2

The Xeon E5-2440 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,473 points. Launch price was $400.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-2440 v2 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2440 v2 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G versus 2.4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2440 v2 — a 47.6% clock advantage for the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G (base: 3.5 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E5-2440 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G scores 7,468 against the Xeon E5-2440 v2's 7,473 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E5-2440 v2. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2440 v2.

Feature	Athlon Gold PRO 3150G	Xeon E5-2440 v2
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+63%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+84%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	20 MB (total)+400%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	12 nm-45%	22 nm
Architecture	Picasso (2019−2022)	Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014)
PassMark	7,468	7,473

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2440 v2 uses LGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.