Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
Xeon E5-2630 v2
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs Xeon E5-2630 v2 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs Xeon E5-2630 v2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs Xeon E5-2630 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $919 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $1,069 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 610.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.8 vs 7.0 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $1,069 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Vega 3, while Xeon E5-2630 v2 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2630 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,468 vs 7,490).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 15 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2630 v2, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Xeon E5-2630 v2
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +25.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+275% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 8.
- ✅400% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.0 vs 49.8 PassMark/$ ($1,069 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon Gold PRO 3150G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-2630 v2 better than Athlon Gold PRO 3150G?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs Xeon E5-2630 v2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 7,468 points. Launch price was $149.
Xeon E5-2630 v2
The Xeon E5-2630 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,490 points. Launch price was $250.
Processing Power
The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-2630 v2 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2630 v2 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon E5-2630 v2 — a 22.9% clock advantage for the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E5-2630 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G scores 7,468 against the Xeon E5-2630 v2's 7,490 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E5-2630 v2. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs 15 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2630 v2.
| Feature | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Xeon E5-2630 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+26% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+35% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 15 MB (total)+275% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 12 nm-45% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Picasso (2019−2022) | Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) |
| PassMark | 7,468 | 7,490 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 549 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 3,654 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2630 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G versus DDR3-1600 on the Xeon E5-2630 v2 — the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G supports 83.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2630 v2 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 1100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Athlon Gold PRO 3150G) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2630 v2). PCIe lanes: 8 (Athlon Gold PRO 3150G) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2630 v2) — the Xeon E5-2630 v2 offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM4 (Athlon Gold PRO 3150G) and C602,C600 (Xeon E5-2630 v2).
| Feature | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Xeon E5-2630 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933+83% | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 768 GB+1100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 40+400% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon Gold PRO 3150G) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2630 v2). The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Vega 3), while the Xeon E5-2630 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E5-2630 v2 targets Server.
| Feature | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Xeon E5-2630 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | — |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G was priced at $150, while the Xeon E5-2630 v2 came in at $1069. On launch pricing ($150 vs $1069), Athlon Gold PRO 3150G was $919 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G delivers 49.8 pts/$ vs 7.0 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2630 v2 — making the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G the 150.7% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Xeon E5-2630 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-86% | $1069 |
| Performance per Dollar | 49.8+611% | 7.0 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2013 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon Gold PRO 3150G and Xeon E5-2630 v2
