
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G

Xeon E5-2608L v4
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs Xeon E5-2608L v4 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs Xeon E5-2608L v4 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs Xeon E5-2608L v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $213 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $363 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 142.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.8 vs 20.5 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $363 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Vega 3, while Xeon E5-2608L v4 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2608L v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2608L v4, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌30% higher power demand at 65W vs 50W.
Xeon E5-2608L v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +25.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 65W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,447 vs 7,468).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.5 vs 49.8 PassMark/$ ($363 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon Gold PRO 3150G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon Gold PRO 3150G better than Xeon E5-2608L v4?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs Xeon E5-2608L v4 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 7,468 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2608L v4
The Xeon E5-2608L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 50 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 7,447 points. Launch price was $363.
Processing Power
The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-2608L v4 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2608L v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G versus 1.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2608L v4 — a 83.6% clock advantage for the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G. The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E5-2608L v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G scores 7,468 against the Xeon E5-2608L v4's 7,447 — a 0.3% lead for the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs 20 MB on the Xeon E5-2608L v4.
| Feature | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Xeon E5-2608L v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+144% | 1.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 20 MB+400% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 2 MB+300% |
| Process | 12 nm-14% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Picasso (2019−2022) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 7,468 | 7,447 |
Advanced Features
The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Vega 3), while the Xeon E5-2608L v4 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Xeon E5-2608L v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G was priced at $150, while the Xeon E5-2608L v4 came in at $363. On launch pricing ($150 vs $363), Athlon Gold PRO 3150G was $213 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G delivers 49.8 pts/$ vs 20.5 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2608L v4 — making the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G the 83.3% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Xeon E5-2608L v4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-59% | $363 |
| Performance per Dollar | 49.8+143% | 20.5 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2016 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















