Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs Xeon E3-1276 v3

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs Xeon E3-1276 v3 Performance Spectrum

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G

4 / 4

7,468

0.0%

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E3-1276 v3

4 / 8

7,543

+1.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs Xeon E3-1276 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs Xeon E3-1276 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $63 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $213 MSRP).
✅Delivers 40.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.8 vs 35.4 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $213 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 84W, a 19W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Vega 3, while Xeon E3-1276 v3 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E3-1276 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (7,468 vs 7,543).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E3-1276 v3, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.

Xeon E3-1276 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 35.4 vs 49.8 PassMark/$ ($213 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌29.2% higher power demand at 84W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon Gold PRO 3150G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E3-1276 v3 better than Athlon Gold PRO 3150G?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1276 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E3-1276 v3 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 16.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1276 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E3-1276 v3 is still the better call for a fresh build. Xeon E3-1276 v3 comes in 42.0% more expensive on MSRP at $213 MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 16.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon Gold PRO 3150G only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 7,468 PassMark with 4 cores and 4 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs Xeon E3-1276 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G

The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 7,468 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E3-1276 v3

The Xeon E3-1276 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 7,543 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon E3-1276 v3's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G versus 4 GHz on the Xeon E3-1276 v3 — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1276 v3 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is built on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G scores 7,468 against the Xeon E3-1276 v3's 7,543 — a 1% lead for the Xeon E3-1276 v3. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Xeon E3-1276 v3.

Feature	Athlon Gold PRO 3150G	Xeon E3-1276 v3
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz	4 GHz+3%
Base Clock	3.5 GHz	3.6 GHz+3%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	8 MB Intel® Smart Cache+100%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	—
Process	12 nm-45%	22 nm
Architecture	Picasso (2019−2022)	—
PassMark	7,468	7,543+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1276 v3 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Athlon Gold PRO 3150G	Xeon E3-1276 v3
Socket	AM4	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2933	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Vega 3), while the Xeon E3-1276 v3 requires a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Athlon Gold PRO 3150G	Xeon E3-1276 v3
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	AMD Radeon Vega 3	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G was priced at $150, while the Xeon E3-1276 v3 came in at $213. On launch pricing ($150 vs $213), Athlon Gold PRO 3150G was $63 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G delivers 49.8 pts/$ vs 35.4 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1276 v3 — making the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G the 33.7% better value option.

Feature	Athlon Gold PRO 3150G	Xeon E3-1276 v3
MSRP	$150-30%	$213
Performance per Dollar	49.8+41%	35.4
Release Date	2020	2014

Search Athlon Gold PRO 3150G on Amazon

Search Xeon E3-1276 v3 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.