
Core i5-8400T

Xeon D-1537
Core i5-8400T vs Xeon D-1537 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-8400T vs Xeon D-1537 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-8400T vs Xeon D-1537: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-8400T
2018Why buy it
- ✅+500% larger total L3 cache (9 MB vs 1.5 MB).
- ✅Costs $288 less on MSRP ($182 MSRP vs $470 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 157.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 40.8 vs 15.8 PassMark/$ ($182 MSRP vs $470 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon D-1537 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon D-1537 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,426 vs 7,444).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1537, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Xeon D-1537
2015Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 9 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.8 vs 40.8 PassMark/$ ($470 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-8400T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-8400T.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon D-1537 better than Core i5-8400T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-8400T vs Xeon D-1537 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-8400T
The Core i5-8400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 9 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 7,426 points. Launch price was $182.

Xeon D-1537
The Xeon D-1537 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (per core). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1667. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,444 points. Launch price was $470.
Processing Power
The Core i5-8400T packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Xeon D-1537 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon D-1537 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-8400T versus 2.3 GHz on the Xeon D-1537 — a 35.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-8400T (base: 1.7 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Core i5-8400T uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon D-1537 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-8400T scores 7,426 against the Xeon D-1537's 7,444 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon D-1537. L3 cache: 9 MB (total) on the Core i5-8400T vs 1.5 MB (per core) on the Xeon D-1537.
| Feature | Core i5-8400T | Xeon D-1537 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 6 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz+43% | 2.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.7 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 9 MB (total)+500% | 1.5 MB (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 7,426 | 7,444 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 3,737 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,092 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 3,816 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-8400T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-1537 uses FCBGA1667 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-8400T | Xeon D-1537 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | FCBGA1667 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Core i5-8400T) / not specified (Xeon D-1537). The Core i5-8400T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon D-1537 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i5-8400T | Xeon D-1537 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-8400T was priced at $182, while the Xeon D-1537 came in at $470. On launch pricing ($182 vs $470), Core i5-8400T was $288 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-8400T delivers 40.8 pts/$ vs 15.8 pts/$ for the Xeon D-1537 — making the Core i5-8400T the 88.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-8400T | Xeon D-1537 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $182-61% | $470 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.8+158% | 15.8 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2015 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














