Core i7-4960HQ vs Opteron 6276

Core i7-4960HQ vs Opteron 6276 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-4960HQ

4 / 8

6,370

+0.3%

6,348

0.0%

Ryzen Embedded V1202B

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

Athlon Gold 7220U

Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

Ryzen 9 5900XT

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4960HQ vs Opteron 6276 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4960HQ vs Opteron 6276: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4960HQ

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 47W instead of 115W, a 68W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6276 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6276, which brings 16 cores / 16 threads.

Opteron 6276

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,348 vs 6,370).
❌Launch MSRP is still $788 MSRP, while Core i7-4960HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌144.7% higher power demand at 115W vs 47W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-4960HQ better than Opteron 6276?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 6276 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-4960HQ is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4960HQ is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-4960HQ is still the faster CPU overall, but Opteron 6276 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i7-4960HQ comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $788 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that Opteron 6276 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 7.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Opteron 6276 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (8.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-4960HQ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 16/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-4960HQ vs Opteron 6276 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4960HQ

The Core i7-4960HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,370 points. Launch price was $657.

Opteron 6276

The Opteron 6276 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,348 points. Launch price was $119.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-4960HQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Opteron 6276 offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Opteron 6276 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-4960HQ versus 3.2 GHz on the Opteron 6276 — a 17.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-4960HQ (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i7-4960HQ uses the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Opteron 6276 uses Interlagos (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4960HQ scores 6,370 against the Opteron 6276's 6,348 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i7-4960HQ. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i7-4960HQ	Opteron 6276
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	16 / 16+300%
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+19%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz+13%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB (per module)
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Crystalwell (2013−2014)	Interlagos (2011−2012)
PassMark	6,370	6,348

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4960HQ uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 6276 uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.