Core i7-4960HQ
VS
Xeon X5675

Core i7-4960HQ vs Xeon X5675

Intel

Core i7-4960HQ

4 Cores8 Thrd47 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Xeon X5675

6 Cores12 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.46 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-4960HQ is positioned at rank 72 and the Xeon X5675 is on rank 998, so the Core i7-4960HQ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4960HQ

#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
94%
#60
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
230%
#61
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
227%
#62
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
208%
#63
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
207%
#64
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
205%
#66
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
198%
#67
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
190%
#68
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
190%
#69
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
185%
#72
Core i7-4960HQ
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#75
Core i3-4030U
MSRP: $281|Avg: N/A
98%
#79
Atom D2500
MSRP: $42|Avg: N/A
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon X5675

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
46597%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
8798%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
7817%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
6039%
#537
Xeon Platinum 8180
MSRP: $10009|Avg: $2363
86%
#538
Xeon Platinum 8280M
MSRP: $10009|Avg: $6223
84%
#539
Xeon Platinum 8280
MSRP: $10009|Avg: $2940
83%
#540
Xeon E7-8891 v3
MSRP: $6841|Avg: $418
71%
#998
Xeon X5675
MSRP: $1440|Avg: $22
100%
#999
Xeon Phi 7210
MSRP: $1881|Avg: $150
87%
#1000
Xeon D-1567
MSRP: $2702|Avg: $230
87%
#1001
Xeon E-2126G
MSRP: $2702|Avg: $230
87%
#1004
Xeon D-1531
MSRP: $2057|Avg: $250
84%
#1005
Xeon 5130
MSRP: $316|Avg: $10
83%
#1007
Xeon E5-4640 v3
MSRP: $2859|Avg: $300
81%
#1008
Xeon E5440
MSRP: $690|Avg: $37
77%
#1009
Xeon E5-2643
MSRP: $1552|Avg: $50
76%
#1010
Xeon E5-2637
MSRP: $885|Avg: $40
75%
#1011
Xeon W3570
MSRP: $999|Avg: $15
73%
#1013
Xeon E5-4620
MSRP: $2141|Avg: $400
70%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($22) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon X5675 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore i7-4960HQXeon X5675
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($22)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Crystalwell (2013−2014) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Westmere-EP (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-4960HQ ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($22 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore i7-4960HQXeon X5675
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($22)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-4960HQ and Xeon X5675

Intel

Core i7-4960HQ

The Core i7-4960HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,370 points. Launch price was $657.

Intel

Xeon X5675

The Xeon X5675 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 12288 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,418 points. Launch price was $162.

Processing Power

The Core i7-4960HQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon X5675 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon X5675 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-4960HQ versus 3.46 GHz on the Xeon X5675 — a 9.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-4960HQ (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.06 GHz). The Core i7-4960HQ uses the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon X5675 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4960HQ scores 6,370 against the Xeon X5675's 6,418 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon X5675. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4960HQ vs 12288 kB (total) on the Xeon X5675.

FeatureCore i7-4960HQXeon X5675
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz+10%
3.46 GHz
Base Clock
2.6 GHz
3.06 GHz+18%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
12288 kB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Crystalwell (2013−2014)
Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark
6,370
6,418
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4960HQ uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X5675 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-4960HQXeon X5675
Socket
BGA1364
LGA1366
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
RAM Channels
3
ECC Support
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-4960HQ) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5675). Primary use case: Xeon X5675 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon X5675 rivals Core i7-980X.

FeatureCore i7-4960HQXeon X5675
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Workstation