Core i7-5700HQ vs Opteron 6344

Intel

Core i7-5700HQ

4 Cores8 Thrd47 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Opteron 6344

12 Cores12 Thrd115 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-5700HQ vs Opteron 6344 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-5700HQ vs Opteron 6344 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-5700HQ vs Opteron 6344: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-5700HQ

2015

Why buy it

  • Draws 47W instead of 115W, a 68W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6344 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (6,037 vs 6,069).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6344, which brings 12 cores / 12 threads.

Opteron 6344

2012

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +7.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 12 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $415 MSRP, while Core i7-5700HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 144.7% higher power demand at 115W vs 47W.

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron 6344 better than Core i7-5700HQ?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 6344 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-5700HQ is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Opteron 6344 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 6344 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Opteron 6344 is the better buy right now. Opteron 6344 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $415 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (14.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-5700HQ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-5700HQ vs Opteron 6344 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-5700HQ

The Core i7-5700HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-H (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,037 points. Launch price was $378.

AMD

Opteron 6344

The Opteron 6344 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,069 points. Launch price was $415.

Processing Power

The Core i7-5700HQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Opteron 6344 offers 12 cores / 12 threads — the Opteron 6344 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i7-5700HQ versus 3.2 GHz on the Opteron 6344 — a 9% clock advantage for the Core i7-5700HQ (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i7-5700HQ uses the Broadwell-H (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Opteron 6344 uses Abu Dhabi (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-5700HQ scores 6,037 against the Opteron 6344's 6,069 — a 0.5% lead for the Opteron 6344. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-5700HQ vs 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6344.

FeatureCore i7-5700HQOpteron 6344
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
12 / 12+200%
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz+9%
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
2.7 GHz+4%
2.6 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)+12700%
2 MB (per module)
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Broadwell-H (2015)
Abu Dhabi (2012)
PassMark
6,037
6,069
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-5700HQ uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 6344 uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-5700HQOpteron 6344
Socket
BGA1364
G34
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0