Core i7-5700HQ vs Processor 300T

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-5700HQ vs Processor 300T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-5700HQ vs Processor 300T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-5700HQ

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,037 vs 6,084).
❌34.3% higher power demand at 47W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on BGA1364, while Processor 300T moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Processor 300T

2024

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 35W instead of 47W, a 12W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1364 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-5700HQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $82 MSRP, while Core i7-5700HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Processor 300T better than Core i7-5700HQ?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-5700HQ is ahead with a 13.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Processor 300T pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Processor 300T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Processor 300T is the better buy right now. Processor 300T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $82 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-5700HQ is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 13.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (74.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Processor 300T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2015), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of BGA1364, and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-5700HQ vs Processor 300T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-5700HQ

The Core i7-5700HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-H (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,037 points. Launch price was $378.

Processor 300T

The Processor 300T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 6,084 points. Launch price was $82.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-5700HQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Processor 300T offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i7-5700HQ has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i7-5700HQ versus 3.4 GHz on the Processor 300T — a 2.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-5700HQ (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i7-5700HQ uses the Broadwell-H (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Processor 300T uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-5700HQ scores 6,037 against the Processor 300T's 6,084 — a 0.8% lead for the Processor 300T. Both processors carry 6 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i7-5700HQ	Processor 300T
Cores / Threads	4 / 8+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+3%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz	3.4 GHz+26%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	6 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+20380%	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture	Broadwell-H (2015)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	6,037	6,084

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-5700HQ uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Processor 300T uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.