Core i7-5960X vs Xeon E5-2695 v2

Intel

Core i7-5960X

8 Cores16 Thrd140 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2695 v2

12 Cores24 Thrd115 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-5960X vs Xeon E5-2695 v2 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-5960X vs Xeon E5-2695 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-5960X vs Xeon E5-2695 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-5960X

2014

Why buy it

  • +0% higher PassMark.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2695 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 30 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2695 v2, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
  • Launch MSRP is still $999 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2695 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 21.7% higher power demand at 140W vs 115W.

Xeon E5-2695 v2

2013

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
  • Draws 115W instead of 140W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (13,380 vs 13,382).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-5960X better than Xeon E5-2695 v2?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2695 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-5960X is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-5960X is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-5960X is the better buy right now. Core i7-5960X comes in at an unclear MSRP at $999 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2695 v2 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (13.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-5960X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 12/24. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-5960X vs Xeon E5-2695 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-5960X

The Core i7-5960X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-E (2014) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,382 points. Launch price was $999.

Intel

Xeon E5-2695 v2

The Xeon E5-2695 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 13,380 points. Launch price was $1,950.

Processing Power

The Core i7-5960X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2695 v2 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-2695 v2 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i7-5960X versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2695 v2 — a 9% clock advantage for the Core i7-5960X (base: 3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i7-5960X uses the Haswell-E (2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-2695 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-5960X scores 13,382 against the Xeon E5-2695 v2's 13,380 — a 0% lead for the Core i7-5960X. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i7-5960X vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2695 v2.

FeatureCore i7-5960XXeon E5-2695 v2
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
12 / 24+50%
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz+9%
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz+25%
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
20 MB (total)
30 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Haswell-E (2014)
Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark
13,382
13,380
Cinebench R23 Multi
9,720
Geekbench 6 Single
1,244
Geekbench 6 Multi
7,412
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA2011 socket with PCIe 3.0.

FeatureCore i7-5960XXeon E5-2695 v2
Socket
LGA2011
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
40
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core i7-5960X) / not specified (Xeon E5-2695 v2).

FeatureCore i7-5960XXeon E5-2695 v2
Integrated GPU
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes