
Core i7-5960X

Xeon E5-2695 v2
Core i7-5960X vs Xeon E5-2695 v2 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-5960X vs Xeon E5-2695 v2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-5960X vs Xeon E5-2695 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-5960X
2014Why buy it
- ✅+0% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2695 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2695 v2, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $999 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2695 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌21.7% higher power demand at 140W vs 115W.
Xeon E5-2695 v2
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 140W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,380 vs 13,382).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-5960X better than Xeon E5-2695 v2?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-5960X vs Xeon E5-2695 v2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-5960X
The Core i7-5960X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-E (2014) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,382 points. Launch price was $999.

Xeon E5-2695 v2
The Xeon E5-2695 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 13,380 points. Launch price was $1,950.
Processing Power
The Core i7-5960X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2695 v2 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-2695 v2 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i7-5960X versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2695 v2 — a 9% clock advantage for the Core i7-5960X (base: 3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i7-5960X uses the Haswell-E (2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-2695 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-5960X scores 13,382 against the Xeon E5-2695 v2's 13,380 — a 0% lead for the Core i7-5960X. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i7-5960X vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2695 v2.
| Feature | Core i7-5960X | Xeon E5-2695 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz+9% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+25% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 30 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell-E (2014) | Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) |
| PassMark | 13,382 | 13,380 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,720 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,244 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,412 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA2011 socket with PCIe 3.0.
| Feature | Core i7-5960X | Xeon E5-2695 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 4 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 40 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Core i7-5960X) / not specified (Xeon E5-2695 v2).
| Feature | Core i7-5960X | Xeon E5-2695 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













