Core i7-640UM
VS
Pentium E6500

Core i7-640UM vs Pentium E6500

Intel

Core i7-640UM

2 Cores4 Thrd18 WWMax: 2.27 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Pentium E6500

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 0.93 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-640UM is positioned at rank 1229 and the Pentium E6500 is on rank 921, so the Pentium E6500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-640UM

#1217
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
7661%
#1218
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
7548%
#1219
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
6930%
#1220
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
6898%
#1221
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
6835%
#1223
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
6601%
#1224
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
6329%
#1225
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
6319%
#1226
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
6149%
#1229
Core i7-640UM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1230
Celeron 570
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
98%
#1232
Core i7-820QM
MSRP: $546|Avg: N/A
87%
#1233
Core Duo T2700
MSRP: $663|Avg: N/A
73%
#1235
Pentium SU4100
MSRP: $289|Avg: $15
62%
#1236
Core Solo T1400
MSRP: $200|Avg: $5
56%
#1237
Core i7-940XM
MSRP: $1096|Avg: N/A
54%
#1238
Core Solo T1350
MSRP: $200|Avg: $70
53%
#1240
Core Solo T1300
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
48%
#1241
Core Solo T1200
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
44%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium E6500

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
22281%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
21054%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
15287%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4605%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3648%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3191%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1828%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1804%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1642%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1642%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1624%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1580%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1558%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1552%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1538%
#302
Core i7-6900K
MSRP: $1089|Avg: $1089
96%
#303
Core i7-5960X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $83
96%
#921
Pentium E6500
MSRP: $84|Avg: $10
100%
#922
Core i5-2500
MSRP: $294|Avg: $69
100%
#924
Athlon II X4 605e
MSRP: $143|Avg: $25
98%
#925
Athlon II X4 610e
MSRP: $143|Avg: $20
98%
#926
Core i5-2390T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $182
98%
#927
Phenom II X4 910e
MSRP: $157|Avg: $69
98%
#928
FX-8100
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
98%
#930
Celeron E1400
MSRP: $53|Avg: $63
96%
#932
Pentium E6800
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
96%
#933
Core i3-530
MSRP: $113|Avg: $15
96%
#935
Core i3-2105
MSRP: $138|Avg: $30
95%
#936
Athlon II X3 405e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i7-640UM leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium E6500 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i7-640UMPentium E6500
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i7-640UMPentium E6500
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-640UM and Pentium E6500

Intel

Core i7-640UM

The Core i7-640UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.27 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800. Passmark benchmark score: 1,168 points. Launch price was $305.

Intel

Pentium E6500

The Pentium E6500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 August 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 0.93 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,175 points. Launch price was $50.

Processing Power

The Core i7-640UM packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Pentium E6500's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.27 GHz on the Core i7-640UM versus 0.93 GHz on the Pentium E6500 — a 83.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-640UM (base: 1.2 GHz vs 2.93 GHz). The Core i7-640UM uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium E6500 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-640UM scores 1,168 against the Pentium E6500's 1,175 — a 0.6% lead for the Pentium E6500. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-640UM vs 0 kB on the Pentium E6500.

FeatureCore i7-640UMPentium E6500
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.27 GHz+144%
0.93 GHz
Base Clock
1.2 GHz
2.93 GHz+144%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
2 MB (total)+700%
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Arrandale (2010−2011)
Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark
1,168
1,175
Geekbench 6 Single
226
Geekbench 6 Multi
590
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-640UM uses the BGA1288 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium E6500 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-640UMPentium E6500
Socket
BGA1288
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-640UM) / not specified (Pentium E6500). The Core i7-640UM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)), while the Pentium E6500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-640UM targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-640UM rivals Core 2 Duo SU9600.

FeatureCore i7-640UMPentium E6500
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Legacy Laptop