Core i7-640UM
VS
Xeon W3505

Core i7-640UM vs Xeon W3505

Intel

Core i7-640UM

2 Cores4 Thrd18 WWMax: 2.27 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Xeon W3505

2 Cores2 Thrd130 WWMax: 0.53 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-640UM is positioned at rank 1229 and the Xeon W3505 is on rank 970, so the Xeon W3505 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-640UM

#1217
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
7661%
#1218
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
7548%
#1219
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
6930%
#1220
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
6898%
#1221
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
6835%
#1223
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
6601%
#1224
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
6329%
#1225
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
6319%
#1226
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
6149%
#1229
Core i7-640UM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1230
Celeron 570
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
98%
#1232
Core i7-820QM
MSRP: $546|Avg: N/A
87%
#1233
Core Duo T2700
MSRP: $663|Avg: N/A
73%
#1235
Pentium SU4100
MSRP: $289|Avg: $15
62%
#1236
Core Solo T1400
MSRP: $200|Avg: $5
56%
#1237
Core i7-940XM
MSRP: $1096|Avg: N/A
54%
#1238
Core Solo T1350
MSRP: $200|Avg: $70
53%
#1240
Core Solo T1300
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
48%
#1241
Core Solo T1200
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
44%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon W3505

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
35708%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
6742%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
5990%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
4627%
#535
Xeon W-3245M
MSRP: $5002|Avg: $5002
98%
#536
Xeon W-3265M
MSRP: $6300|Avg: $3500
97%
#969
Xeon E5-2687W v2
MSRP: $2112|Avg: $62
100%
#970
Xeon W3505
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#971
Xeon L5430
MSRP: $390|Avg: $380
99%
#972
Xeon E5-2470
MSRP: $1440|Avg: $125
99%
#973
Xeon E5-2670
MSRP: $1552|Avg: $60
99%
#975
Xeon X3470
MSRP: $589|Avg: $16
97%
#978
Xeon E5-2689
MSRP: $1800|Avg: $18
95%
#979
Xeon E5-2450L
MSRP: $1106|Avg: $78
94%
#980
Xeon X3480
MSRP: $612|Avg: $48
93%
#981
Xeon E5-2687W
MSRP: $1885|Avg: $70
91%
#982
Xeon E5-4610
MSRP: $1219|Avg: $50
91%
#984
Xeon X7550
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $1400
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon W3505 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore i7-640UMXeon W3505
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Bloomfield (2008−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-640UM ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($0 less, NaN% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore i7-640UMXeon W3505
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-640UM and Xeon W3505

Intel

Core i7-640UM

The Core i7-640UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.27 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800. Passmark benchmark score: 1,168 points. Launch price was $305.

Intel

Xeon W3505

The Xeon W3505 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 0.53 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,163 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Core i7-640UM packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon W3505's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.27 GHz on the Core i7-640UM versus 0.53 GHz on the Xeon W3505 — a 124.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-640UM (base: 1.2 GHz vs 2.53 GHz). The Core i7-640UM uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon W3505 uses Bloomfield (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-640UM scores 1,168 against the Xeon W3505's 1,163 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i7-640UM. Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i7-640UMXeon W3505
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.27 GHz+328%
0.53 GHz
Base Clock
1.2 GHz
2.53 GHz+111%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Arrandale (2010−2011)
Bloomfield (2008−2010)
PassMark
1,168
1,163
Geekbench 6 Single
226
Geekbench 6 Multi
590
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-640UM uses the BGA1288 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon W3505 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-640UMXeon W3505
Socket
BGA1288
LGA1366
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-640UM) / not specified (Xeon W3505). The Core i7-640UM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)), while the Xeon W3505 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-640UM targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-640UM rivals Core 2 Duo SU9600.

FeatureCore i7-640UMXeon W3505
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Legacy Laptop