Core i7-6560U
VS
Xeon X3480

Core i7-6560U vs Xeon X3480

Intel

Core i7-6560U

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2015
VS
Intel

Xeon X3480

4 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.73 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-6560U is positioned at rank 378 and the Xeon X3480 is on rank 981, so the Core i7-6560U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-6560U

#366
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
526%
#367
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
518%
#368
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
476%
#369
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
474%
#370
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
469%
#372
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
453%
#373
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
435%
#374
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
434%
#375
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
422%
#378
Core i7-6560U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#391
Core i5-1145GRE
MSRP: $362|Avg: N/A
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon X3480

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
38203%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
7213%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
6408%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
4951%
#981
Xeon X3480
MSRP: $612|Avg: $48
100%
#982
Xeon E5-2687W
MSRP: $1885|Avg: $70
98%
#983
Xeon E5-4610
MSRP: $1219|Avg: $50
97%
#985
Xeon X7550
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $1400
97%
#986
Xeon E7540
MSRP: $1980|Avg: $146
96%
#987
Xeon E7530
MSRP: $1391|Avg: $146
96%
#988
Xeon E5-4627 v4
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $200
95%
#989
Xeon E5-4627 v3
MSRP: $2225|Avg: $200
94%
#990
Xeon X5660
MSRP: $1219|Avg: $10
90%
#991
Xeon E5-2667
MSRP: $1552|Avg: $31
88%
#992
Xeon E5-2690
MSRP: $2057|Avg: $150
87%
#993
Xeon E3-1565L v5
MSRP: $1552|Avg: $120
87%
#994
Xeon L5640
MSRP: $996|Avg: N/A
86%
#995
Xeon E5-4627 v2
MSRP: $2061|Avg: $70
84%
#996
Xeon L5335
MSRP: $380|Avg: $18
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($48) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon X3480 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore i7-6560UXeon X3480
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($48)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Lynnfield (2009−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-6560U ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($48 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore i7-6560UXeon X3480
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($48)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-6560U and Xeon X3480

Intel

Core i7-6560U

The Core i7-6560U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,347 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Xeon X3480

The Xeon X3480 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 3.73 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,327 points. Launch price was $612.

Processing Power

The Core i7-6560U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon X3480 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon X3480 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-6560U versus 3.73 GHz on the Xeon X3480 — a 15.3% clock advantage for the Xeon X3480 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.06 GHz). The Core i7-6560U uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon X3480 uses Lynnfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-6560U scores 3,347 against the Xeon X3480's 3,327 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i7-6560U. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i7-6560U vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon X3480.

FeatureCore i7-6560UXeon X3480
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz
3.73 GHz+17%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
3.06 GHz+39%
L3 Cache
4 MB
8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
512 kB+100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-69%
45 nm
Architecture
Skylake (2015−2016)
Lynnfield (2009−2010)
PassMark
3,347
3,327
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-6560U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X3480 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-6560UXeon X3480
Socket
BGA1356
LGA1156
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0