Core i7-6567U vs FX-6100

Core i7-6567U vs FX-6100 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-6567U

2 / 4

3,680

0.0%

3,686

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-6567U vs FX-6100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-6567U vs FX-6100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-6567U

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 95W, a 67W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,680 vs 3,686).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).

FX-6100

2011

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $165 MSRP, while Core i7-6567U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌239.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 28W.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-6100 better than Core i7-6567U?

Yes. FX-6100 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, FX-6100 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-6100 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 6 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-6100 is the better buy right now. FX-6100 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $165 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (22.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-6567U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-6567U vs FX-6100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-6567U

The Core i7-6567U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,680 points. Launch price was $69.

FX-6100

The FX-6100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,686 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-6567U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-6100 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the FX-6100 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-6567U versus 3.9 GHz on the FX-6100 — a 8% clock advantage for the FX-6100 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i7-6567U uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-6100 uses Zambezi (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-6567U scores 3,680 against the FX-6100's 3,686 — a 0.2% lead for the FX-6100. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i7-6567U vs 8 MB (total) on the FX-6100.

Feature	Core i7-6567U	FX-6100
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	6 / 6+200%
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz	3.9 GHz+8%
Base Clock	3.3 GHz	3.3 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB	8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	512 kB	6 MB+1100%
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Zambezi (2011−2012)
PassMark	3,680	3,686

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-6567U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-6100 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.