Core i7-6567U vs Ryzen 3 3250U

Intel

Core i7-6567U

2 Cores4 Thrd28 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen 3 3250U

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2020
Ryzen family
·······

Core i7-6567U vs Ryzen 3 3250U Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-6567U vs Ryzen 3 3250U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-6567U vs Ryzen 3 3250U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-6567U

2015

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (3,680 vs 3,718).
    • 86.7% higher power demand at 28W vs 15W.

    Ryzen 3 3250U

    2020

    Why buy it

    • +1% higher PassMark.
    • Draws 15W instead of 28W, a 13W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Ryzen 3 3250U better than Core i7-6567U?
    It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-6567U is ahead with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 3250U pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 3250U is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Ryzen 3 3250U still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 3 3250U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1% better PassMark.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Ryzen 3 3250U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Core i7-6567U vs Ryzen 3 3250U Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Core i7-6567U

    The Core i7-6567U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,680 points. Launch price was $69.

    AMD

    Ryzen 3 3250U

    The Ryzen 3 3250U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,718 points. Launch price was $69.

    Processing Power

    Both the Core i7-6567U and Ryzen 3 3250U share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-6567U versus 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen 3 3250U — a 2.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-6567U (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i7-6567U uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 3250U uses Picasso (2019−2022) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-6567U scores 3,680 against the Ryzen 3 3250U's 3,718 — a 1% lead for the Ryzen 3 3250U. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i7-6567U vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 3250U.

    FeatureCore i7-6567URyzen 3 3250U
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 4
    2 / 4
    Boost Clock
    3.6 GHz+3%
    3.5 GHz
    Base Clock
    3.3 GHz+27%
    2.6 GHz
    L3 Cache
    4 MB
    4 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    512 kB
    512 kB (per core)
    Process
    14 nm
    14 nm
    Architecture
    Skylake (2015−2016)
    Picasso (2019−2022)
    PassMark
    3,680
    3,718+1%
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Core i7-6567U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 3250U uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCore i7-6567URyzen 3 3250U
    Socket
    BGA1356
    FP5
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0
    PCIe 3.0