Core i7-660UM vs Athlon X2 450
Core i7-660UM
Athlon X2 450
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-660UM is positioned at rank 1225 and the Athlon X2 450 is on rank 760, so the Athlon X2 450 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-660UM
Performance Per Dollar Athlon X2 450
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i7-660UM | Athlon X2 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($317) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Kaveri (2014−2015) / 28 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i7-660UM | Athlon X2 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+2040%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($317) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-660UM and Athlon X2 450
Core i7-660UM
The Core i7-660UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800. Passmark benchmark score: 1,279 points. Launch price was $317.
Athlon X2 450
The Athlon X2 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,295 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i7-660UM packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Athlon X2 450's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Core i7-660UM versus 3.9 GHz on the Athlon X2 450 — a 47.6% clock advantage for the Athlon X2 450 (base: 1.33 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i7-660UM uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon X2 450 uses Kaveri (2014−2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-660UM scores 1,279 against the Athlon X2 450's 1,295 — a 1.2% lead for the Athlon X2 450. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 250 vs 450, a 57.1% lead for the Athlon X2 450 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 600 vs 800 (28.6% advantage for the Athlon X2 450).
| Feature | Core i7-660UM | Athlon X2 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.9 GHz+63% |
| Base Clock | 1.33 GHz | 3.5 GHz+163% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 1 MB (total)+300% |
| Process | 32 nm | 28 nm-13% |
| Architecture | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Kaveri (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 1,279 | 1,295+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 1,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 250 | 450+80% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 600 | 800+33% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-660UM uses the BGA1288 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon X2 450 uses FM2+ (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1066 memory speed. The Athlon X2 450 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: PM55,HM55,QM57,HM57 (Core i7-660UM) and A88X,A78,A68H (Athlon X2 450).
| Feature | Core i7-660UM | Athlon X2 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1288 | FM2+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | DDR3-1866 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-660UM) vs AMD-V (Athlon X2 450). The Core i7-660UM includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics), while the Athlon X2 450 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-660UM targets Budget, Athlon X2 450 targets Basic Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon X2 450 rivals Core i3-3220.
| Feature | Core i7-660UM | Athlon X2 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Budget | Basic Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-660UM launched at $317 MSRP, while the Athlon X2 450 debuted at $60.
| Feature | Core i7-660UM | Athlon X2 450 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $317 | $60-81% |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $15 |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2014 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i7-660UM and Athlon X2 450
