Core i7-660UM vs Xeon E3110

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-660UM vs Xeon E3110 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-660UM vs Xeon E3110: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-660UM

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 18W instead of 65W, a 47W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics, while Xeon E3110 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E3110 across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,279 vs 1,295).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.0 vs 6.1 PassMark/$ ($317 MSRP vs $214 MSRP).

Xeon E3110

2008

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Costs $103 less on MSRP ($214 MSRP vs $317 MSRP).
✅Delivers 50.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 6.1 vs 4.0 PassMark/$ ($214 MSRP vs $317 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌261.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 18W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-660UM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E3110 better than Core i7-660UM?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3110 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-660UM is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E3110 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.5% more average FPS across 46 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3110 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E3110 is the better buy right now. Xeon E3110 comes in $103 cheaper on MSRP at $214 MSRP versus $317 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.5% average FPS lead across 46 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 50.0% better value on MSRP (6.1 vs 4.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-660UM makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-660UM vs Xeon E3110 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-660UM

The Core i7-660UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800. Passmark benchmark score: 1,279 points. Launch price was $317.

Xeon E3110

The Xeon E3110 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,295 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-660UM is built on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i7-660UM scores 1,279 against the Xeon E3110's 1,295 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon E3110. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-660UM vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E3110.

Feature	Core i7-660UM	Xeon E3110
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	—
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	—
Base Clock	1.33 GHz	3 GHz+126%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	6 MB L2 Cache+50%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	—
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Arrandale (2010−2011)	—
PassMark	1,279	1,295+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	250	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	600	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-660UM uses the BGA1288 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E3110 uses LGA775 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-660UM	Xeon E3110
Socket	BGA1288	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-660UM) / not specified (Xeon E3110). The Core i7-660UM includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics), while the Xeon E3110 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-660UM targets Budget.

Feature	Core i7-660UM	Xeon E3110
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-660UM was priced at $317, while the Xeon E3110 came in at $214. On launch pricing ($317 vs $214), Xeon E3110 was $103 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-660UM delivers 4.0 pts/$ vs 6.1 pts/$ for the Xeon E3110 — making the Xeon E3110 the 40% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-660UM	Xeon E3110
MSRP	$317	$214-32%
Performance per Dollar	4.0	6.1+52%
Release Date	2010	2008

Search Core i7-660UM on Amazon

Search Xeon E3110 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.