A4-5000 vs Core i7-660UM
A4-5000
Core i7-660UM
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A4-5000 is positioned at rank 847 and the Core i7-660UM is on rank 1225, so the A4-5000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A4-5000
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-660UM
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A4-5000 | Core i7-660UM |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($317) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Kabini (2013−2014) / 28 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A4-5000 | Core i7-660UM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($317) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A4-5000 and Core i7-660UM
A4-5000
The A4-5000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,284 points. Launch price was $50.
Core i7-660UM
The Core i7-660UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800. Passmark benchmark score: 1,279 points. Launch price was $317.
Processing Power
The A4-5000 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-660UM offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A4-5000 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the A4-5000 versus 2.4 GHz on the Core i7-660UM — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-660UM. The A4-5000 uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i7-660UM uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A4-5000 scores 1,284 against the Core i7-660UM's 1,279 — a 0.4% lead for the A4-5000. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 158 vs 250, a 45.1% lead for the Core i7-660UM that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-5000 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-660UM.
| Feature | A4-5000 | Core i7-660UM |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 1.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz+60% |
| Base Clock | — | 1.33 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB+700% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm-13% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Kabini (2013−2014) | Arrandale (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,284 | 1,279 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 158 | 250+58% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 600 |
Memory & Platform
The A4-5000 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-660UM uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3L-1600 memory speed. The A4-5000 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A4-5000) vs 2 (Core i7-660UM). PCIe lanes: 8 (A4-5000) vs 16 (Core i7-660UM) — the Core i7-660UM offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | A4-5000 | Core i7-660UM |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT3 | BGA1288 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1600 | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 16+100% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4-5000) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-660UM). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8330 (A4-5000) and HD Graphics (Core i7-660UM) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-5000 targets Entry Laptop, Core i7-660UM targets Budget. Direct competitor: A4-5000 rivals Pentium N3520.
| Feature | A4-5000 | Core i7-660UM |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 8330 | HD Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Entry Laptop | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A4-5000 and Core i7-660UM
