A4-5000
Celeron E3500
A4-5000 vs Celeron E3500 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A4-5000 vs Celeron E3500 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A4-5000 vs Celeron E3500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A4-5000
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8330, while Celeron E3500 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (158 vs 347).
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,284 vs 1,290).
Celeron E3500
2010Why buy it
- ✅+119.6% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $62 MSRP, while A4-5000 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A4-5000 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron E3500 better than A4-5000?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A4-5000 vs Celeron E3500 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
A4-5000
The A4-5000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,284 points. Launch price was $50.
Celeron E3500
The Celeron E3500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,290 points. Launch price was $62.
Processing Power
The A4-5000 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron E3500 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A4-5000 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the A4-5000 versus 2.7 GHz on the Celeron E3500 — a 57.1% clock advantage for the Celeron E3500. The A4-5000 uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron E3500 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A4-5000 scores 1,284 against the Celeron E3500's 1,290 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron E3500. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 158 vs 347, a 74.9% lead for the Celeron E3500 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | A4-5000 | Celeron E3500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.5 GHz | 2.7 GHz+80% |
| Base Clock | — | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB+100% | 1 MB (total) |
| Process | 28 nm-38% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Kabini (2013−2014) | Wolfdale (2008−2010) |
| PassMark | 1,284 | 1,290 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 158 | 347+120% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 624 |
Memory & Platform
The A4-5000 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron E3500 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the A4-5000 versus DDR3-1066 on the Celeron E3500 — the A4-5000 supports 50.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A4-5000 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A4-5000) vs 2 (Celeron E3500). PCIe lanes: 8 (A4-5000) vs 0 (Celeron E3500) — the A4-5000 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | A4-5000 | Celeron E3500 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT3 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1600+50% | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4-5000) vs VT-x (Celeron E3500). The A4-5000 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8330), while the Celeron E3500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-5000 targets Entry Laptop, Celeron E3500 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A4-5000 rivals Pentium N3520; Celeron E3500 rivals Pentium E5200.
| Feature | A4-5000 | Celeron E3500 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 8330 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x |
| Target Use | Entry Laptop | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A4-5000 and Celeron E3500
