A4-5000
Athlon X2 450
A4-5000 vs Athlon X2 450 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A4-5000 vs Athlon X2 450 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A4-5000 vs Athlon X2 450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A4-5000
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8330, while Athlon X2 450 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (158 vs 450).
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,284 vs 1,295).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon X2 450.
Athlon X2 450
2014Why buy it
- ✅+184.8% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock Cooler), unlike A4-5000.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $60 MSRP, while A4-5000 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A4-5000 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon X2 450 better than A4-5000?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A4-5000 vs Athlon X2 450 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
A4-5000
The A4-5000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,284 points. Launch price was $50.
Athlon X2 450
The Athlon X2 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,295 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The A4-5000 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon X2 450 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A4-5000 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the A4-5000 versus 3.9 GHz on the Athlon X2 450 — a 88.9% clock advantage for the Athlon X2 450. The A4-5000 uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon X2 450 uses Kaveri (2014−2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the A4-5000 scores 1,284 against the Athlon X2 450's 1,295 — a 0.9% lead for the Athlon X2 450. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 158 vs 450, a 96.1% lead for the Athlon X2 450 that directly translates to higher frame rates.
| Feature | A4-5000 | Athlon X2 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.5 GHz | 3.9 GHz+160% |
| Base Clock | — | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB+100% | 1 MB (total) |
| Process | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Architecture | Kabini (2013−2014) | Kaveri (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 1,284 | 1,295 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 1,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 158 | 450+185% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 800 |
Memory & Platform
The A4-5000 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon X2 450 uses FM2+ (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the A4-5000 versus DDR3-1866 on the Athlon X2 450 — the Athlon X2 450 supports 16.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (A4-5000) vs 2 (Athlon X2 450). PCIe lanes: 8 (A4-5000) vs 16 (Athlon X2 450) — the Athlon X2 450 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | A4-5000 | Athlon X2 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT3 | FM2+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1600 | DDR3-1866+17% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 16+100% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The A4-5000 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8330), while the Athlon X2 450 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-5000 targets Entry Laptop, Athlon X2 450 targets Basic Desktop. Direct competitor: A4-5000 rivals Pentium N3520; Athlon X2 450 rivals Core i3-3220.
| Feature | A4-5000 | Athlon X2 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 8330 | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Entry Laptop | Basic Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A4-5000 and Athlon X2 450
