Core i7-6820EQ vs Ryzen 3 3200G

Core i7-6820EQ vs Ryzen 3 3200G Performance Spectrum

Core i7-6820EQ

4 / 8

7,025

+0.4%

6,999

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-6820EQ vs Ryzen 3 3200G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-6820EQ vs Ryzen 3 3200G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-6820EQ

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.6 vs 70.0 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Ryzen 3 3200G

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $278 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
✅Delivers 276.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 70.0 vs 18.6 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-6820EQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (6,999 vs 7,025).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-6820EQ better than Ryzen 3 3200G?

Yes. Core i7-6820EQ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-6820EQ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-6820EQ is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-6820EQ is still the better call for a fresh build. Core i7-6820EQ comes in 278.0% more expensive on MSRP at $378 MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 3 3200G only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 6,999 PassMark with 4 cores and 4 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 3200G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-6820EQ vs Ryzen 3 3200G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-6820EQ

The Core i7-6820EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Max frequency: 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 7,025 points. Launch price was $378.

Ryzen 3 3200G

The Ryzen 3 3200G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,999 points. Launch price was $99.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-6820EQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 3 3200G's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Core i7-6820EQ versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 3200G — a 35.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 3200G. The Core i7-6820EQ uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 3200G uses Picasso (2019−2022) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-6820EQ scores 7,025 against the Ryzen 3 3200G's 6,999 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i7-6820EQ. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Core i7-6820EQ vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 3200G.

Feature	Core i7-6820EQ	Ryzen 3 3200G
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz	4 GHz+43%
Base Clock	—	3.6 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB+100%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	512 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm	12 nm-14%
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Picasso (2019−2022)
PassMark	7,025	6,999

🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Core i7-6820EQ versus DDR4-2933 on the Ryzen 3 3200G — the Ryzen 3 3200G supports 37.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-6820EQ) vs 12 (Ryzen 3 3200G) — the Core i7-6820EQ offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Core i7-6820EQ	Ryzen 3 3200G
Socket	—	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133	DDR4-2933+38%
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+33%	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-6820EQ) / not specified (Ryzen 3 3200G). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 530 (Core i7-6820EQ) and AMD Radeon Vega 8 (Ryzen 3 3200G) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-6820EQ targets Embedded.

Feature	Core i7-6820EQ	Ryzen 3 3200G
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 530	AMD Radeon Vega 8
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Embedded	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-6820EQ was priced at $378, while the Ryzen 3 3200G came in at $100. On launch pricing ($378 vs $100), Ryzen 3 3200G was $278 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-6820EQ delivers 18.6 pts/$ vs 70.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 3200G — making the Ryzen 3 3200G the 116.1% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-6820EQ	Ryzen 3 3200G
MSRP	$378	$100-74%
Performance per Dollar	18.6	70.0+276%
Release Date	2015	2019

Search Core i7-6820EQ on Amazon

Search Ryzen 3 3200G on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.