Core i7-6820EQ vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U

Core i7-6820EQ vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U Performance Spectrum

Core i7-6820EQ

4 / 8

7,025

+0.7%

6,978

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-6820EQ vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-6820EQ vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-6820EQ

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 530, while Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $378 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌200% higher power demand at 45W vs 15W.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 45W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,978 vs 7,025).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-6820EQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U better than Core i7-6820EQ?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U is ahead with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-6820EQ pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark. Core i7-6820EQ also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-6820EQ is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U is still the much better call for a fresh build. Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $378 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-6820EQ only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2015 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (18.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on that older DDR4-era platform.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-6820EQ vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-6820EQ

The Core i7-6820EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Max frequency: 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 7,025 points. Launch price was $378.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U

The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,978 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-6820EQ and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Core i7-6820EQ versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U — a 30.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U. The Core i7-6820EQ uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U uses Raven Ridge (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-6820EQ scores 7,025 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U's 6,978 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i7-6820EQ. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Core i7-6820EQ vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U.

Feature	Core i7-6820EQ	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz	3.8 GHz+36%
Base Clock	—	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB+100%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	512 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Raven Ridge (2017−2019)
PassMark	7,025	6,978

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-6820EQ) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U). The Core i7-6820EQ includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 530), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-6820EQ targets Embedded.