
Core i7-6820EQ

Xeon E5-4607 v2
Core i7-6820EQ vs Xeon E5-4607 v2 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-6820EQ vs Xeon E5-4607 v2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-6820EQ vs Xeon E5-4607 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-6820EQ
2015Why buy it
- โ +0.6% higher PassMark.
- โ Draws 45W instead of 95W, a 50W reduction.
- โ 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- โ Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 530, while Xeon E5-4607 v2 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- โWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-4607 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- โSmaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 15 MB).
- โLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4607 v2, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
- โLower PassMark per dollar, at 18.6 vs 166.3 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
Xeon E5-4607 v2
2014Why buy it
- โ Better for gaming: +9.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- โ +87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).
- โ Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.
- โ Costs $336 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
- โ Delivers 795.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 166.3 vs 18.6 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- โLower PassMark (6,986 vs 7,025).
- โ111.1% higher power demand at 95W vs 45W.
- โNo integrated graphics, while Core i7-6820EQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-6820EQ better than Xeon E5-4607 v2?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-6820EQ vs Xeon E5-4607 v2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-6820EQ
The Core i7-6820EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015โ2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Max frequency: 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 7,025 points. Launch price was $378.

Xeon E5-4607 v2
The Xeon E5-4607 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB Intelยฎ Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 6,986 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i7-6820EQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-4607 v2 offers 6 cores / 12 threads โ the Xeon E5-4607 v2 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Core i7-6820EQ versus 2.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-4607 v2 โ a 7.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-6820EQ. The Core i7-6820EQ is built on the Skylake (2015โ2016) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i7-6820EQ scores 7,025 against the Xeon E5-4607 v2's 6,986 โ a 0.6% lead for the Core i7-6820EQ. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Core i7-6820EQ vs 15 MB Intelยฎ Smart Cache on the Xeon E5-4607 v2.
| Feature | Core i7-6820EQ | Xeon E5-4607 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz+8% | 2.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | โ | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 15 MB Intelยฎ Smart Cache+88% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | โ |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake (2015โ2016) | โ |
| PassMark | 7,025 | 6,986 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-6820EQ) / not specified (Xeon E5-4607 v2). The Core i7-6820EQ includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 530), while the Xeon E5-4607 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-6820EQ targets Embedded.
| Feature | Core i7-6820EQ | Xeon E5-4607 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | โ |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 530 | โ |
| Unlocked | No | โ |
| AVX-512 | No | โ |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | โ |
| Target Use | Embedded | โ |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-6820EQ was priced at $378, while the Xeon E5-4607 v2 came in at $42. On launch pricing ($378 vs $42), Xeon E5-4607 v2 was $336 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-6820EQ delivers 18.6 pts/$ vs 166.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4607 v2 โ making the Xeon E5-4607 v2 the 159.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-6820EQ | Xeon E5-4607 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $378 | $42-89% |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.6 | 166.3+794% |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2014 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















