Core i7-6900K
VS
Ryzen 7 5825C

Core i7-6900K vs Ryzen 7 5825C

Intel

Core i7-6900K

8 Cores16 Thrd140 WWMax: 4 GHz2016
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 5825C

8 Cores16 Thrd15 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2022

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-6900K

#287
Core Ultra 9 285T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $549
499%
#288
Ryzen Threadripper 1950
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
164%
#288
Core i5-12500TE
MSRP: $225|Avg: $225
495%
#289
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
MSRP: $108|Avg: $70
491%
#290
Core i9-10900KF
MSRP: $509|Avg: $336
491%
#291
Core i9-7900X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $188
155%
#291
Core i9-14900T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $577
491%
#292
Core i5-13500T
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
491%
#293
Core i3-10300
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $140.49
491%
#294
Core i9-10900F
MSRP: $464|Avg: $300
490%
#294
Core i9-7920X
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $236
145%
#295
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
MSRP: $449|Avg: $429
489%
#295
Core i9-7940X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $275
135%
#296
Core i7-9700F
MSRP: $323|Avg: $200
488%
#297
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1419
485%
#298
Core i5-9500F
MSRP: $187|Avg: $154
481%
#298
Core i9-7960X
MSRP: $1699|Avg: $185
122%
#299
Core i9-11900KB
MSRP: $539|Avg: $350
481%
#299
Core i9-7980XE
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $300
110%
#300
Core i7-10700F
MSRP: $310|Avg: $250
479%
#301
Core i7-10700T
MSRP: $355|Avg: $200
478%
#302
Core i7-6900K
MSRP: $1089|Avg: $1089
100%
#302
Celeron G5920
MSRP: $52|Avg: $40
478%
#303
Core i3-10105T
MSRP: $122|Avg: $122
475%
#303
Core i7-5960X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $83
99%
#304
Core i7-6950X
MSRP: $1723|Avg: $180
76%
#304
Celeron G5900
MSRP: $50|Avg: $42
474%
#305
Core 5 120
MSRP: $340|Avg: $340
472%
#306
Core i7-12700T
MSRP: $339|Avg: $337
467%
#307
Core 3 100HL
MSRP: $306|Avg: $280
466%
#308
Core i9-11900F
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $358.87
456%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 7 5825C

#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
110%
#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
107%
#178
Core i7-1360P
MSRP: $480|Avg: $280
106%
#179
Core i7-1260P
MSRP: $432|Avg: $432
106%
#184
Core Ultra 7 266V
MSRP: $520|Avg: $520
102%
#185
Ryzen 7 5825C
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
100%
#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
93%
#188
Core i7-10870H
MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen 7 5825C (2022) utilizes 7 nm technology and DDR4-3200, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i7-6900KRyzen 7 5825C
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($1,089)
More affordable ($400)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-E (2016) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) / 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-6900K (2016) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR4, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i7-6900KRyzen 7 5825C
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+170%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($1,089)
More affordable ($400)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-6900K and Ryzen 7 5825C

Intel

Core i7-6900K

The Core i7-6900K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 May 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-E (2016) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,682 points. Launch price was $1,020.

AMD

Ryzen 7 5825C

The Ryzen 7 5825C is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 May 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 14,561 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-6900K and Ryzen 7 5825C share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i7-6900K versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5825C — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5825C (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i7-6900K uses the Broadwell-E (2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5825C uses Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-6900K scores 14,682 against the Ryzen 7 5825C's 14,561 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i7-6900K. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,273 vs 1,961, a 42.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 5825C that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 7,591 vs 7,145 (6.1% advantage for the Core i7-6900K). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i7-6900K vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5825C.

FeatureCore i7-6900KRyzen 7 5825C
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4 GHz
4.5 GHz+13%
Base Clock
3.2 GHz+60%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
20 MB (total)+25%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm
7 nm-50%
Architecture
Broadwell-E (2016)
Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023)
PassMark
14,682
14,561
Cinebench R23 Multi
9,551
Geekbench 6 Single
1,273
1,961+54%
Geekbench 6 Multi
7,591+6%
7,145
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-6900K uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 5825C uses FP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2400 memory speed. The Core i7-6900K supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Core i7-6900K) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 5825C). PCIe lanes: 40 (Core i7-6900K) vs 8 (Ryzen 7 5825C) — the Core i7-6900K offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X99 (Core i7-6900K) and SoC (Ryzen 7 5825C).

FeatureCore i7-6900KRyzen 7 5825C
Socket
LGA2011
FP6
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB+100%
64 GB
RAM Channels
4+100%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
40+400%
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-6900K) vs Yes (Ryzen 7 5825C). The Ryzen 7 5825C includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 8), while the Core i7-6900K requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-6900K targets High-End Desktop.

FeatureCore i7-6900KRyzen 7 5825C
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
Radeon Vega 8
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Yes
Target Use
High-End Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-6900K launched at $1089 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 5825C debuted at $400. At current prices ($1089 vs $400), the Ryzen 7 5825C is $689 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-6900K delivers 13.5 pts/$ vs 36.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5825C — making the Ryzen 7 5825C the 91.9% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-6900KRyzen 7 5825C
MSRP
$1089
$400-63%
Avg Price (30d)
$1089
$400-63%
Performance per Dollar
13.5
36.4+170%
Release Date
2016
2022