
Core i7-6900K

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
Core i7-6900K vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-6900K vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-6900K vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-6900K
2016Why buy it
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,682 vs 14,699).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.5 vs 44.7 PassMark/$ ($1,089 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $760 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,089 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 231.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 44.7 vs 13.5 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,089 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 better than Core i7-6900K?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-6900K vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-6900K
The Core i7-6900K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 May 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-E (2016) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,682 points. Launch price was $1,020.


Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 14,699 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Core i7-6900K and Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i7-6900K versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-6900K (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i7-6900K uses the Broadwell-E (2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-6900K scores 14,682 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700's 14,699 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i7-6900K vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700.
| Feature | Core i7-6900K | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+8% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+7% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total)+25% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Broadwell-E (2016) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 14,682 | 14,699 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,273 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,591 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-6900K uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-6900K | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 4 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 40 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-6900K) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 1700). Primary use case: Core i7-6900K targets High-End Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-6900K | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | High-End Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-6900K was priced at $1089, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 came in at $329. On launch pricing ($1089 vs $329), Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 was $760 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-6900K delivers 13.5 pts/$ vs 44.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 — making the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 the 107.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-6900K | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1089 | $329-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.5 | 44.7+231% |
| Release Date | 2016 | 2017 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













