Core i7-7560U vs Core i7-2670QM

CPU

GPU

Core i7-7560U

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2017

Core i7-2670QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core i7-7560U

2 / 4

3,760

+0.3%

3,748

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-7560U is positioned at rank 786 and the Core i7-2670QM is on rank 42, so the Core i7-2670QM offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-7560U

#774

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

1170%

#775

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

1153%

#776

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

1059%

#777

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

1054%

#778

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

1044%

#780

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

1008%

#781

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

967%

#782

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

965%

#783

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

939%

#786

Core i7-7560U

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#790

Athlon 64 TF-20

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

99%

#795

Core i3-1115G4E

MSRP: $213|Avg: $47

98%

#797

Celeron M 900

MSRP: $86|Avg: $10

97%

#800

Celeron B815

MSRP: $86|Avg: $15

97%

#801

Celeron B810

MSRP: $86|Avg: $86

97%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2670QM

#10

Ryzen 7 260

MSRP: $199|Avg: $70

95%

#30

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

196%

#31

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

193%

#32

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

177%

#33

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

176%

#34

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

175%

#36

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

169%

#37

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

162%

#38

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

161%

#39

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

157%

#42

Core i7-2670QM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#43

Core 2 Duo SU7300

MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A

100%

#51

Celeron N2807

MSRP: $107|Avg: $60

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i7-7560U (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	Core i7-7560U	Core i7-2670QM
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing
Longevity	✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-2670QM (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	Core i7-7560U	Core i7-2670QM
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-7560U Benchmark Check

Core i7-2670QM Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-7560U and Core i7-2670QM

Core i7-7560U

The Core i7-7560U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,760 points. Launch price was $415.

Core i7-2670QM

The Core i7-2670QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,748 points. Launch price was $378.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-7560U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-2670QM offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-2670QM has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-7560U versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-2670QM — a 20.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-7560U (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i7-7560U uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-2670QM uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-7560U scores 3,760 against the Core i7-2670QM's 3,748 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i7-7560U. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i7-7560U vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-2670QM.

Feature	Core i7-7560U	Core i7-2670QM
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+23%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+9%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB	6 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	512 kB+100%	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	3,760	3,748

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-7560U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-2670QM uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2133 on the Core i7-7560U versus 1600 on the Core i7-2670QM — the Core i7-7560U supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i7-7560U) vs 16 (Core i7-2670QM) — the Core i7-2670QM offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Kaby Lake-U (Core i7-7560U) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67 (Core i7-2670QM).

Feature	Core i7-7560U	Core i7-2670QM
Socket	BGA1356	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	2133+33%	1600
Max RAM Capacity	32	32
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	❌	❌
PCIe Lanes	12	16+33%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support true virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 (Core i7-7560U) and Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2670QM) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-7560U targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core i7-2670QM rivals AMD A8-3510MX.