Core i7-7560U vs PRO A10-8850B

Intel

Core i7-7560U

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2017
VS
AMD

PRO A10-8850B

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2015

Core i7-7560U vs PRO A10-8850B Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-7560U vs PRO A10-8850B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-7560U vs PRO A10-8850B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-7560U

2017

Why buy it

  • βœ…+0.2% higher PassMark.
  • βœ…Draws 15W instead of 95W, a 80W reduction.
  • βœ…100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • βœ…Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, while PRO A10-8850B needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than PRO A10-8850B across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

PRO A10-8850B

2015

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +11.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (3,752 vs 3,760).
  • ❌533.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 15W.
  • ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-7560U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-7560U better than PRO A10-8850B?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, PRO A10-8850B is ahead with a 11.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-7560U pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-7560U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-7560U still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-7560U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-7560U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-7560U vs PRO A10-8850B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-7560U

The Core i7-7560U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016βˆ’2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,760 points. Launch price was $415.

AMD

PRO A10-8850B

The PRO A10-8850B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Godaveri (2014βˆ’2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,752 points. Launch price was $69.

⚑

Processing Power

The Core i7-7560U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the PRO A10-8850B offers 4 cores / 4 threads β€” the PRO A10-8850B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-7560U versus 4.1 GHz on the PRO A10-8850B β€” a 7.6% clock advantage for the PRO A10-8850B (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Core i7-7560U uses the Kaby Lake (2016βˆ’2019) architecture (14 nm), while the PRO A10-8850B uses Godaveri (2014βˆ’2016) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-7560U scores 3,760 against the PRO A10-8850B's 3,752 β€” a 0.2% lead for the Core i7-7560U.

FeatureCore i7-7560UPRO A10-8850B
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz
4.1 GHz+8%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
3.9 GHz+63%
L3 Cache
4 MB
β€”
L2 Cache
512 kB
4096 kB+700%
Process
14 nm-50%
28 nm
Architecture
Kaby Lake (2016βˆ’2019)
Godaveri (2014βˆ’2016)
PassMark
3,760
3,752
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-7560U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the PRO A10-8850B uses FM2+ (PCIe 3.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-7560UPRO A10-8850B
Socket
BGA1356
FM2+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
2133
β€”
Max RAM Capacity
32
β€”
RAM Channels
2
β€”
ECC Support
No
β€”
PCIe Lanes
12
β€”
πŸ”§

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i7-7560U) / not specified (PRO A10-8850B). The Core i7-7560U includes integrated graphics (Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640), while the PRO A10-8850B requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-7560U targets Mobile.

FeatureCore i7-7560UPRO A10-8850B
Integrated GPU
Yes
β€”
IGPU Model
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
β€”
Unlocked
No
β€”
AVX-512
No
β€”
Virtualization
true
β€”
Target Use
Mobile
β€”