Core i7-2670QM vs Core i7-7560U

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-2670QM vs Core i7-7560U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-2670QM vs Core i7-7560U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-2670QM

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,748 vs 3,760).
❌200% higher power demand at 45W vs 15W.

Core i7-7560U

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 45W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-2670QM across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-7560U better than Core i7-2670QM?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-2670QM is ahead with a 11.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-7560U pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark. Core i7-2670QM also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-7560U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-7560U still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-7560U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-7560U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-2670QM vs Core i7-7560U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-2670QM

The Core i7-2670QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,748 points. Launch price was $378.

Core i7-7560U

The Core i7-7560U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,760 points. Launch price was $415.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-2670QM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i7-7560U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i7-2670QM has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-2670QM versus 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-7560U — a 20.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-7560U (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i7-2670QM uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-7560U uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2670QM scores 3,748 against the Core i7-7560U's 3,760 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i7-7560U. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-2670QM vs 4 MB on the Core i7-7560U.

Feature	Core i7-2670QM	Core i7-7560U
Cores / Threads	4 / 8+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz	3.8 GHz+23%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.4 GHz+9%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)+50%	4 MB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB+100%
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	3,748	3,760

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2670QM uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-7560U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the Core i7-2670QM versus 2133 on the Core i7-7560U — the Core i7-7560U supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-2670QM) vs 12 (Core i7-7560U) — the Core i7-2670QM offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67 (Core i7-2670QM) and Kaby Lake-U (Core i7-7560U).

Feature	Core i7-2670QM	Core i7-7560U
Socket	PGA988	BGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	1600	2133+33%
Max RAM Capacity	32	32
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+33%	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support true virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2670QM) and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 (Core i7-7560U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-7560U targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core i7-2670QM rivals AMD A8-3510MX.