Atom C3708
VS
Core i7-2670QM

Atom C3708 vs Core i7-2670QM

Intel

Atom C3708

8 Cores8 Thrd17 WWMax: 1.7 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Core i7-2670QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom C3708 is positioned at rank 615 and the Core i7-2670QM is on rank 42, so the Core i7-2670QM offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom C3708

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
9977%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1884%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1674%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1293%
#366
Xeon Silver 4216
MSRP: $1011|Avg: $800
100%
#367
EPYC 9454P
MSRP: $4598|Avg: $3333
99%
#369
Xeon Gold 6542Y
MSRP: $2878|Avg: N/A
96%
#370
EPYC 7502
MSRP: $2600|Avg: $1299
96%
#371
Xeon 6730P
MSRP: $3726|Avg: $3726
95%
#372
Xeon Gold 6330
MSRP: $2128|Avg: $2128
95%
#373
Xeon Gold 6548Y+
MSRP: $3726|Avg: $3726
95%
#374
Xeon Gold 6448H
MSRP: $3658|Avg: N/A
94%
#375
Xeon D-2766NT
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $212
94%
#376
Xeon Gold 6442Y
MSRP: $2878|Avg: N/A
94%
#615
Atom C3708
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#618
Xeon W-2133
MSRP: $617|Avg: $617
98%
#622
Xeon E5607
MSRP: $135|Avg: $27
96%
#626
Xeon Silver 4209T
MSRP: $563|Avg: $649
94%
#627
Xeon E3-1240
MSRP: $273|Avg: $39
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2670QM

#10
Ryzen 7 260
MSRP: $199|Avg: $70
95%
#30
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
196%
#31
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
193%
#32
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
177%
#33
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
176%
#34
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
175%
#36
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
169%
#37
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
162%
#38
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
161%
#39
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
157%
#42
Core i7-2670QM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#43
Core 2 Duo SU7300
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
100%
#51
Celeron N2807
MSRP: $107|Avg: $60
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom C3708 (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4: 2133, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAtom C3708Core i7-2670QM
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Goldmont (2016−2017) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-2670QM (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAtom C3708Core i7-2670QM
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom C3708 and Core i7-2670QM

Intel

Atom C3708

The Atom C3708 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,750 points. Launch price was $209.

Intel

Core i7-2670QM

The Core i7-2670QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,748 points. Launch price was $378.

Processing Power

The Atom C3708 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i7-2670QM offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Atom C3708 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the Atom C3708 versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-2670QM — a 58.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-2670QM (base: 1.7 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Atom C3708 uses the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-2670QM uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Atom C3708 scores 3,750 against the Core i7-2670QM's 3,748 — a 0.1% lead for the Atom C3708. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Atom C3708 vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-2670QM.

FeatureAtom C3708Core i7-2670QM
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+100%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
1.7 GHz
3.1 GHz+82%
Base Clock
1.7 GHz
2.2 GHz+29%
L3 Cache
16 MB+167%
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
16 MB+6300%
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Goldmont (2016−2017)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
3,750
3,748
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom C3708 uses the FCBGA1310 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-2670QM uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Atom C3708 versus 1600 on the Core i7-2670QM — the Core i7-2670QM supports 199% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom C3708 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 32 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA1310 (Atom C3708) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67 (Core i7-2670QM).

FeatureAtom C3708Core i7-2670QM
Socket
FCBGA1310
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133
1600+39900%
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB+838860700%
32
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom C3708) / true (Core i7-2670QM). The Core i7-2670QM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Atom C3708 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-2670QM rivals AMD A8-3510MX.

FeatureAtom C3708Core i7-2670QM
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true