Atom C3708 vs Pentium Gold G5400

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom C3708 vs Pentium Gold G5400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom C3708 vs Pentium Gold G5400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom C3708

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Draws 17W instead of 54W, a 37W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Pentium Gold G5400 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Pentium Gold G5400

2018

Why buy it

✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Atom C3708 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Atom C3708 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,735 vs 3,750).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 16 MB).
❌217.6% higher power demand at 54W vs 17W.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom C3708 better than Pentium Gold G5400?

Yes. Atom C3708 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 9.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Atom C3708 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom C3708 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom C3708 still makes the most sense overall. Atom C3708 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium Gold G5400 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom C3708 vs Pentium Gold G5400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom C3708

The Atom C3708 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,750 points. Launch price was $209.

Pentium Gold G5400

The Pentium Gold G5400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,735 points. Launch price was $64.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom C3708 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Pentium Gold G5400 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Atom C3708 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the Atom C3708 versus 3.7 GHz on the Pentium Gold G5400 — a 74.1% clock advantage for the Pentium Gold G5400 (base: 1.7 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Atom C3708 uses the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium Gold G5400 uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Atom C3708 scores 3,750 against the Pentium Gold G5400's 3,735 — a 0.4% lead for the Atom C3708. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Atom C3708 vs 4 MB (total) on the Pentium Gold G5400.

Feature	Atom C3708	Pentium Gold G5400
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+300%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.7 GHz	3.7 GHz+118%
Base Clock	1.7 GHz	3.7 GHz+118%
L3 Cache	16 MB+300%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	16 MB	256K (per core)+1500%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Goldmont (2016−2017)	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
PassMark	3,750	3,735

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom C3708 uses the FCBGA1310 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium Gold G5400 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Atom C3708 versus DDR4-2400 on the Pentium Gold G5400 — the Pentium Gold G5400 supports 12.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom C3708 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

Feature	Atom C3708	Pentium Gold G5400
Socket	FCBGA1310	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133	DDR4-2400+13%
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB+300%	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom C3708) / VT-x (Pentium Gold G5400). The Pentium Gold G5400 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Atom C3708 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium Gold G5400 targets Budget.