Atom C3708 vs PRO A10-8850B

Atom C3708 vs PRO A10-8850B Performance Spectrum

Atom C3708

8 / 8

3,750

0.0%

3,752

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom C3708 vs PRO A10-8850B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom C3708 vs PRO A10-8850B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom C3708

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 17W instead of 95W, a 78W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,750 vs 3,752).

PRO A10-8850B

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Atom C3708 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌458.8% higher power demand at 95W vs 17W.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom C3708 better than PRO A10-8850B?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Atom C3708 is ahead with a 7.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, PRO A10-8850B pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, PRO A10-8850B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom C3708 still makes the most sense overall. Atom C3708 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom C3708 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom C3708 vs PRO A10-8850B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom C3708

The Atom C3708 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,750 points. Launch price was $209.

PRO A10-8850B

The PRO A10-8850B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,752 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom C3708 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the PRO A10-8850B offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Atom C3708 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the Atom C3708 versus 4.1 GHz on the PRO A10-8850B — a 82.8% clock advantage for the PRO A10-8850B (base: 1.7 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Atom C3708 uses the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture (14 nm), while the PRO A10-8850B uses Godaveri (2014−2016) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Atom C3708 scores 3,750 against the PRO A10-8850B's 3,752 — a 0.1% lead for the PRO A10-8850B.

Feature	Atom C3708	PRO A10-8850B
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+100%	4 / 4
Boost Clock	1.7 GHz	4.1 GHz+141%
Base Clock	1.7 GHz	3.9 GHz+129%
L3 Cache	16 MB	—
L2 Cache	16 MB+300%	4096 kB
Process	14 nm-50%	28 nm
Architecture	Goldmont (2016−2017)	Godaveri (2014−2016)
PassMark	3,750	3,752

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom C3708 uses the FCBGA1310 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the PRO A10-8850B uses FM2+ (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.