Core i7-2670QM vs Ryzen 3 3200U

Core i7-2670QM vs Ryzen 3 3200U Performance Spectrum

Core i7-2670QM

4 / 8

3,748

+0.5%

3,730

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-2670QM vs Ryzen 3 3200U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-2670QM vs Ryzen 3 3200U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-2670QM

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 3000, while Ryzen 3 3200U needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌200% higher power demand at 45W vs 15W.

Ryzen 3 3200U

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 45W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-2670QM across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,730 vs 3,748).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-2670QM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-2670QM better than Ryzen 3 3200U?

Yes. Core i7-2670QM is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-2670QM is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-2670QM is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-2670QM still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-2670QM comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 3200U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-2670QM vs Ryzen 3 3200U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-2670QM

The Core i7-2670QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,748 points. Launch price was $378.

Ryzen 3 3200U

The Ryzen 3 3200U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso-U (Zen) (2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,730 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-2670QM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 3 3200U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i7-2670QM has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-2670QM versus 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen 3 3200U — a 12.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 3200U (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i7-2670QM uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 3 3200U uses Picasso-U (Zen) (2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2670QM scores 3,748 against the Ryzen 3 3200U's 3,730 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i7-2670QM. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-2670QM vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 3200U.

Feature	Core i7-2670QM	Ryzen 3 3200U
Cores / Threads	4 / 8+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz	3.5 GHz+13%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.6 GHz+18%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)+50%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512K (per core)+100%
Process	32 nm	12 nm-63%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Picasso-U (Zen) (2019)
PassMark	3,748	3,730

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2670QM uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 3 3200U uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-2670QM	Ryzen 3 3200U
Socket	PGA988	FP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i7-2670QM) / not specified (Ryzen 3 3200U). The Core i7-2670QM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Ryzen 3 3200U requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-2670QM rivals AMD A8-3510MX.