Core i7-2670QM vs PRO A10-8850B

Core i7-2670QM vs PRO A10-8850B Performance Spectrum

Core i7-2670QM

4 / 8

3,748

0.0%

3,752

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-2670QM vs PRO A10-8850B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-2670QM vs PRO A10-8850B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-2670QM

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 95W, a 50W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 3000, while PRO A10-8850B needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,748 vs 3,752).

PRO A10-8850B

2015

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌111.1% higher power demand at 95W vs 45W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-2670QM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is PRO A10-8850B better than Core i7-2670QM?

Yes. PRO A10-8850B is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, PRO A10-8850B is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, PRO A10-8850B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

PRO A10-8850B still makes the most sense overall. PRO A10-8850B comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

PRO A10-8850B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-2670QM vs PRO A10-8850B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-2670QM

The Core i7-2670QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,748 points. Launch price was $378.

PRO A10-8850B

The PRO A10-8850B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,752 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-2670QM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the PRO A10-8850B's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-2670QM versus 4.1 GHz on the PRO A10-8850B — a 27.8% clock advantage for the PRO A10-8850B (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Core i7-2670QM uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the PRO A10-8850B uses Godaveri (2014−2016) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2670QM scores 3,748 against the PRO A10-8850B's 3,752 — a 0.1% lead for the PRO A10-8850B.

Feature	Core i7-2670QM	PRO A10-8850B
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz	4.1 GHz+32%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	3.9 GHz+77%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	4096 kB+1500%
Process	32 nm	28 nm-13%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Godaveri (2014−2016)
PassMark	3,748	3,752

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2670QM uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the PRO A10-8850B uses FM2+ (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-2670QM	PRO A10-8850B
Socket	PGA988	FM2+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i7-2670QM) / not specified (PRO A10-8850B). The Core i7-2670QM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the PRO A10-8850B requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-2670QM rivals AMD A8-3510MX.