Core i7-2670QM vs PRO A12-9800

Core i7-2670QM vs PRO A12-9800 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-2670QM

4 / 8

3,748

0.0%

3,751

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-2670QM vs PRO A12-9800 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-2670QM vs PRO A12-9800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-2670QM

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 3000, while PRO A12-9800 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,748 vs 3,751).

PRO A12-9800

2016

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $110 MSRP, while Core i7-2670QM mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-2670QM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is PRO A12-9800 better than Core i7-2670QM?

Yes. PRO A12-9800 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, PRO A12-9800 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, PRO A12-9800 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

PRO A12-9800 is the better buy right now. PRO A12-9800 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $110 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (34.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

PRO A12-9800 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-2670QM vs PRO A12-9800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-2670QM

The Core i7-2670QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,748 points. Launch price was $378.

PRO A12-9800

The PRO A12-9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 October 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,751 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-2670QM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the PRO A12-9800's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-2670QM versus 4.2 GHz on the PRO A12-9800 — a 30.1% clock advantage for the PRO A12-9800 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i7-2670QM uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the PRO A12-9800 uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2670QM scores 3,748 against the PRO A12-9800's 3,751 — a 0.1% lead for the PRO A12-9800.

Feature	Core i7-2670QM	PRO A12-9800
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz	4.2 GHz+35%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	3.8 GHz+73%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	2048 kB+700%
Process	32 nm	28 nm-13%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark	3,748	3,751

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2670QM uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the PRO A12-9800 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-2670QM	PRO A12-9800
Socket	PGA988	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i7-2670QM) / not specified (PRO A12-9800). The Core i7-2670QM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the PRO A12-9800 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-2670QM rivals AMD A8-3510MX.