Core i7-2670QM
VS
Opteron 3280

Core i7-2670QM vs Opteron 3280

Intel

Core i7-2670QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2011
VS
AMD

Opteron 3280

8 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-2670QM is positioned at rank 42 and the Opteron 3280 is on rank 93, so the Core i7-2670QM offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2670QM

#10
Ryzen 7 260
MSRP: $199|Avg: $70
95%
#30
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
196%
#31
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
193%
#32
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
177%
#33
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
176%
#34
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
175%
#36
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
169%
#37
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
162%
#38
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
161%
#39
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
157%
#42
Core i7-2670QM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#43
Core 2 Duo SU7300
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
100%
#51
Celeron N2807
MSRP: $107|Avg: $60
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 3280

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
2197%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
415%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
369%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
285%
#71
Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
MSRP: $400|Avg: $343
92%
#73
EPYC 4484PX
MSRP: $599|Avg: $599
89%
#93
Opteron 3280
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Opteron 3280 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i7-2670QM in both compute-intensive tasks (0.9% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i7-2670QMOpteron 3280
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Zurich (2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i7-2670QMOpteron 3280
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-2670QM and Opteron 3280

Intel

Core i7-2670QM

The Core i7-2670QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,748 points. Launch price was $378.

AMD

Opteron 3280

The Opteron 3280 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zurich (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,783 points. Launch price was $229.

Processing Power

The Core i7-2670QM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Opteron 3280 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Opteron 3280 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-2670QM versus 3.5 GHz on the Opteron 3280 — a 12.1% clock advantage for the Opteron 3280 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i7-2670QM uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Opteron 3280 uses Zurich (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2670QM scores 3,748 against the Opteron 3280's 3,783 — a 0.9% lead for the Opteron 3280. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-2670QM vs 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 3280.

FeatureCore i7-2670QMOpteron 3280
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
8 / 8+100%
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz
3.5 GHz+13%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
2.5 GHz+14%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
8 MB+3100%
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Zurich (2012)
PassMark
3,748
3,783
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2670QM uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Opteron 3280 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-2670QMOpteron 3280
Socket
PGA988
AM3+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
1600
Max RAM Capacity
32
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i7-2670QM) / not specified (Opteron 3280). The Core i7-2670QM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Opteron 3280 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-2670QM rivals AMD A8-3510MX.

FeatureCore i7-2670QMOpteron 3280
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true