
Core i7-7660U

Opteron 6212
Core i7-7660U vs Opteron 6212 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-7660U vs Opteron 6212 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-7660U vs Opteron 6212: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-7660U
2017Why buy it
- ✅+2.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 115W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Plus 640, while Opteron 6212 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6212 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6212, which brings 8 cores / 8 threads.
Opteron 6212
2011Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 8 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,973 vs 4,059).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $266 MSRP, while Core i7-7660U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌666.7% higher power demand at 115W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-7660U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-7660U better than Opteron 6212?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-7660U vs Opteron 6212 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-7660U
The Core i7-7660U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,059 points. Launch price was $415.

Opteron 6212
The Opteron 6212 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,973 points. Launch price was $266.
Processing Power
The Core i7-7660U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron 6212 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Opteron 6212 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i7-7660U versus 3.2 GHz on the Opteron 6212 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-7660U (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i7-7660U uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Opteron 6212 uses Interlagos (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-7660U scores 4,059 against the Opteron 6212's 3,973 — a 2.1% lead for the Core i7-7660U. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i7-7660U vs 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6212.
| Feature | Core i7-7660U | Opteron 6212 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 8 / 8+300% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+25% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.6 GHz+4% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 8 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 2 MB (per module)+300% |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Interlagos (2011−2012) |
| PassMark | 4,059+2% | 3,973 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 1,759 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,150 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,285 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-7660U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 6212 uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-7660U | Opteron 6212 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1356 | G34 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-7660U) / not specified (Opteron 6212). The Core i7-7660U includes integrated graphics (Iris Plus 640), while the Opteron 6212 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-7660U targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i7-7660U rivals Core i5-8250U.
| Feature | Core i7-7660U | Opteron 6212 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Iris Plus 640 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Productivity | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















