
Core i7-7700HQ

Ryzen 3 1300X
Core i7-7700HQ vs Ryzen 3 1300X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-7700HQ vs Ryzen 3 1300X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-7700HQ vs Ryzen 3 1300X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-7700HQ
2017Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +10.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 3 1300X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (6,880 vs 6,923).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 3 1300X.
Ryzen 3 1300X
2017Why buy it
- β +0.6% higher PassMark.
- β +33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- β 50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-7700HQ.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-7700HQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLaunch MSRP is still $129 MSRP, while Core i7-7700HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i7-7700HQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 1300X better than Core i7-7700HQ?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-7700HQ vs Ryzen 3 1300X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-7700HQ
The Core i7-7700HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-H (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,880 points. Launch price was $378.


Ryzen 3 1300X
The Ryzen 3 1300X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017β2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,923 points. Launch price was $129.
Processing Power
The Core i7-7700HQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 3 1300X's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-7700HQ versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 1300X β a 2.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-7700HQ (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i7-7700HQ uses the Kaby Lake-H (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 1300X uses Zen (2017β2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-7700HQ scores 6,880 against the Ryzen 3 1300X's 6,923 β a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 3 1300X. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-7700HQ vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 1300X.
| Feature | Core i7-7700HQ | Ryzen 3 1300X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+3% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.4 GHz+21% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake-H (2017) | Zen (2017β2020) |
| PassMark | 6,880 | 6,923 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 3,486 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 1,120 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 3,155 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-7700HQ uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 1300X uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Core i7-7700HQ versus DDR4-2666 on the Ryzen 3 1300X β the Ryzen 3 1300X supports 11.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-7700HQ) vs 24 (Ryzen 3 1300X) β the Ryzen 3 1300X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: BGA1440 (Core i7-7700HQ) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,X570 (Ryzen 3 1300X).
| Feature | Core i7-7700HQ | Ryzen 3 1300X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1440 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-2666+11% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 24+50% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 3 1300X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking β a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-7700HQ) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 3 1300X). The Core i7-7700HQ includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 3 1300X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 3 1300X targets Gaming.
| Feature | Core i7-7700HQ | Ryzen 3 1300X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 630 | β |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | β | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














