
Core i7-7700HQ

Xeon X5680
Core i7-7700HQ vs Xeon X5680 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-7700HQ vs Xeon X5680 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-7700HQ vs Xeon X5680: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-7700HQ
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 130W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 630, while Xeon X5680 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,880 vs 6,910).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X5680, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
Xeon X5680
2010Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $450 MSRP, while Core i7-7700HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌188.9% higher power demand at 130W vs 45W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-7700HQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-7700HQ better than Xeon X5680?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-7700HQ vs Xeon X5680 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-7700HQ
The Core i7-7700HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-H (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,880 points. Launch price was $378.

Xeon X5680
The Xeon X5680 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.33 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,910 points. Launch price was $172.
Processing Power
The Core i7-7700HQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon X5680 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon X5680 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-7700HQ versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon X5680 — a 5.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-7700HQ (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.33 GHz). The Core i7-7700HQ uses the Kaby Lake-H (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon X5680 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-7700HQ scores 6,880 against the Xeon X5680's 6,910 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon X5680. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-7700HQ vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon X5680.
| Feature | Core i7-7700HQ | Xeon X5680 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+6% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.33 GHz+19% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 12 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake-H (2017) | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 6,880 | 6,910 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-7700HQ uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X5680 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Core i7-7700HQ versus DDR3-1333 on the Xeon X5680 — the Core i7-7700HQ supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-7700HQ) vs 3 (Xeon X5680). Chipset compatibility: BGA1440 (Core i7-7700HQ) and Intel X58,Intel 5520 (Xeon X5680).
| Feature | Core i7-7700HQ | Xeon X5680 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1440 | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400+80% | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 3+50% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-7700HQ) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5680). The Core i7-7700HQ includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the Xeon X5680 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon X5680 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon X5680 rivals Core i7-980X.
| Feature | Core i7-7700HQ | Xeon X5680 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














