
Core i7-7700HQ
Popular choices:

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-7700HQ
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-7700HQ across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,813 vs 6,880).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $99 MSRP, while Core i7-7700HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-7700HQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-7700HQ
2017Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-7700HQ across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,813 vs 6,880).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $99 MSRP, while Core i7-7700HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-7700HQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-7700HQ better than Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-7700HQ | Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-7700HQ | Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 127 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 127 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 66 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-7700HQ | Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 170 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 170 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 170 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 137 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-7700HQ | Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 170 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 170 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 170 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 170 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-7700HQ and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE

Core i7-7700HQ
Core i7-7700HQ
The Core i7-7700HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-H (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,880 points. Launch price was $378.


Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 6,813 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i7-7700HQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-7700HQ versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE — a 5.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i7-7700HQ uses the Kaby Lake-H (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE uses Picasso (2019−2022) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-7700HQ scores 6,880 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE's 6,813 — a 1% lead for the Core i7-7700HQ. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-7700HQ vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE.
| Feature | Core i7-7700HQ | Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 4 GHz+5% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.3 GHz+18% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total)+50% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 12 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake-H (2017) | Picasso (2019−2022) |
| PassMark | 6,880 | 6,813 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-7700HQ uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-7700HQ | Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1440 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-7700HQ) / not specified (Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE). The Core i7-7700HQ includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i7-7700HQ | Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













