
Core i7-7820HK

Ryzen 5 5600X
Core i7-7820HK vs Ryzen 5 5600X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-7820HK vs Ryzen 5 5600X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-7820HK vs Ryzen 5 5600X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-7820HK
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,397 vs 21,845).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.6 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +63.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Costs $79 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 273.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 19.6 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600X better than Core i7-7820HK?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-7820HK vs Ryzen 5 5600X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-7820HK
The Core i7-7820HK is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-H (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,397 points. Launch price was $378.


Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-7820HK packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 5 5600X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-7820HK versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X — a 16.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600X (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i7-7820HK uses the Kaby Lake-H (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-7820HK scores 7,397 against the Ryzen 5 5600X's 21,845 — a 98.8% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600X. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-7820HK vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X.
| Feature | Core i7-7820HK | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 4.6 GHz+18% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.7 GHz+28% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 32 MB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake-H (2017) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 7,397 | 21,845+195% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-7820HK uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-7820HK | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1440 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-7820HK) / AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-7820HK | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-7820HK was priced at $378, while the Ryzen 5 5600X came in at $299. On launch pricing ($378 vs $299), Ryzen 5 5600X was $79 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-7820HK delivers 19.6 pts/$ vs 73.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5600X — making the Ryzen 5 5600X the 115.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-7820HK | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $378 | $299-21% |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.6 | 73.1+273% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













