Core i3-9320 vs Core i7-7820HK

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-9320 vs Core i7-7820HK FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-9320 vs Core i7-7820HK: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-9320

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $224 less on MSRP ($154 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
✅Delivers 144.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 19.6 PassMark/$ ($154 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-7820HK across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (7,358 vs 7,397).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌37.8% higher power demand at 62W vs 45W.

Core i7-7820HK

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Draws 45W instead of 62W, a 17W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.6 vs 47.8 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $154 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-7820HK better than Core i3-9320?

Yes. Core i7-7820HK is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-7820HK is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-7820HK is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-7820HK is still the better call for a fresh build. Core i7-7820HK comes in 145.5% more expensive on MSRP at $378 MSRP versus $154 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-9320 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 7,358 PassMark with 4 cores and 4 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-9320 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-9320 vs Core i7-7820HK Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-9320

The Core i3-9320 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 7,358 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i7-7820HK

The Core i7-7820HK is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-H (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,397 points. Launch price was $378.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-9320 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-7820HK's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i3-9320 versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-7820HK — a 12% clock advantage for the Core i3-9320 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i3-9320 uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-7820HK uses Kaby Lake-H (2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-9320 scores 7,358 against the Core i7-7820HK's 7,397 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i7-7820HK. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-9320 vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-7820HK.

Feature	Core i3-9320	Core i7-7820HK
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+13%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+28%	2.9 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	Kaby Lake-H (2017)
PassMark	7,358	7,397

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-9320 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-7820HK uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-9320	Core i7-7820HK
Socket	LGA1151	BGA1440
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-9320 was priced at $154, while the Core i7-7820HK came in at $378. On launch pricing ($154 vs $378), Core i3-9320 was $224 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-9320 delivers 47.8 pts/$ vs 19.6 pts/$ for the Core i7-7820HK — making the Core i3-9320 the 83.8% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-9320	Core i7-7820HK
MSRP	$154-59%	$378
Performance per Dollar	47.8+144%	19.6
Release Date	2019	2017

Search Core i3-9320 on Amazon

Search Core i7-7820HK on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.