Core i3-9320 vs Xeon E3-1505M v6

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-9320 vs Xeon E3-1505M v6 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-9320 vs Xeon E3-1505M v6: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-9320

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $280 less on MSRP ($154 MSRP vs $434 MSRP).
✅Delivers 178.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 17.1 PassMark/$ ($154 MSRP vs $434 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,358 vs 7,441).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E3-1505M v6, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
❌37.8% higher power demand at 62W vs 45W.

Xeon E3-1505M v6

2017

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.
✅Draws 45W instead of 62W, a 17W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.1 vs 47.8 PassMark/$ ($434 MSRP vs $154 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-9320 better than Xeon E3-1505M v6?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1505M v6 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-9320 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1505M v6 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-9320 is the better buy right now. Core i3-9320 comes in $280 cheaper on MSRP at $154 MSRP versus $434 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E3-1505M v6 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.1% better PassMark. It is also 178.7% better value on MSRP (47.8 vs 17.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-9320 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-9320 vs Xeon E3-1505M v6 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-9320

The Core i3-9320 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 7,358 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E3-1505M v6

The Xeon E3-1505M v6 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,441 points. Launch price was $623.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-9320 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon E3-1505M v6's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i3-9320 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon E3-1505M v6 — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Core i3-9320 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i3-9320 uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E3-1505M v6 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-9320 scores 7,358 against the Xeon E3-1505M v6's 7,441 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon E3-1505M v6. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-9320 vs 8 MB on the Xeon E3-1505M v6.

Feature	Core i3-9320	Xeon E3-1505M v6
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+10%	4 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+23%	3 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8 MB+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	7,358	7,441+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-9320 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1505M v6 uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-9320	Xeon E3-1505M v6
Socket	LGA1151	BGA1440
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-9320 was priced at $154, while the Xeon E3-1505M v6 came in at $434. On launch pricing ($154 vs $434), Core i3-9320 was $280 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-9320 delivers 47.8 pts/$ vs 17.1 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1505M v6 — making the Core i3-9320 the 94.4% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-9320	Xeon E3-1505M v6
MSRP	$154-65%	$434
Performance per Dollar	47.8+180%	17.1
Release Date	2019	2017

Search Core i3-9320 on Amazon

Search Xeon E3-1505M v6 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.