
Core i7-7820X

Core Ultra 5 228V
Core i7-7820X vs Core Ultra 5 228V Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-7820X vs Core Ultra 5 228V FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-7820X vs Core Ultra 5 228V: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-7820X
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (11 MB vs 8 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 28.7 vs 57.5 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $295 MSRP).
- ❌723.5% higher power demand at 140W vs 17W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 228V moves to FCBGA2833 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 228V can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core Ultra 5 228V
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $304 less on MSRP ($295 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 100.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 57.5 vs 28.7 PassMark/$ ($295 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 17W instead of 140W, a 123W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2833 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-7820X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,955 vs 17,171).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 11 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-7820X better than Core Ultra 5 228V?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-7820X vs Core Ultra 5 228V Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-7820X
The Core i7-7820X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 17,171 points. Launch price was $599.

Core Ultra 5 228V
The Core Ultra 5 228V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 16,955 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-7820X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, matching the Core Ultra 5 228V's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i7-7820X versus 4.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 228V — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i7-7820X uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 228V uses Lunar Lake (2024) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-7820X scores 17,171 against the Core Ultra 5 228V's 16,955 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i7-7820X. L3 cache: 11 MB (total) on the Core i7-7820X vs 8 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 228V.
| Feature | Core i7-7820X | Core Ultra 5 228V |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+71% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 11 MB (total)+38% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2.5 MB (per core)+150% |
| Process | 14 nm | 3 nm-79% |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Lunar Lake (2024) |
| PassMark | 17,171+1% | 16,955 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 9,932 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,585 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 10,053 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-7820X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Ultra 5 228V uses FCBGA2833 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-7820X | Core Ultra 5 228V |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | FCBGA2833 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | LPDDR5X-8533 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 8 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-7820X) / Yes (Core Ultra 5 228V). The Core Ultra 5 228V includes integrated graphics (Arc 130V), while the Core i7-7820X requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i7-7820X | Core Ultra 5 228V |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Arc 130V |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | Yes |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-7820X was priced at $599, while the Core Ultra 5 228V came in at $295. On launch pricing ($599 vs $295), Core Ultra 5 228V was $304 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-7820X delivers 28.7 pts/$ vs 57.5 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 5 228V — making the Core Ultra 5 228V the 66.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-7820X | Core Ultra 5 228V |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $295-51% |
| Performance per Dollar | 28.7 | 57.5+100% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














