Core i7-7820X vs Xeon E5-2689 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-7820X vs Xeon E5-2689 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-7820X vs Xeon E5-2689 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-7820X

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,124 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $2,723 MSRP).
✅Delivers 356.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 28.7 vs 6.3 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $2,723 MSRP).
✅Draws 140W instead of 165W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (11 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2689 v4, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.

Xeon E5-2689 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+127.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 11 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-7820X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (17,084 vs 17,171).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 28.7 PassMark/$ ($2,723 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
❌17.9% higher power demand at 165W vs 140W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-7820X better than Xeon E5-2689 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2689 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-7820X is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-7820X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 12.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-7820X is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-7820X is the better buy right now. Core i7-7820X comes in $2,124 cheaper on MSRP at $599 MSRP versus $2,723 MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 356.9% better value on MSRP (28.7 vs 6.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-7820X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 10/20. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-7820X vs Xeon E5-2689 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-7820X

The Core i7-7820X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 17,171 points. Launch price was $599.

Xeon E5-2689 v4

The Xeon E5-2689 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 17,084 points. Launch price was $2,723.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-7820X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2689 v4 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2689 v4 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i7-7820X versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2689 v4 — a 16.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-7820X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i7-7820X uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2689 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-7820X scores 17,171 against the Xeon E5-2689 v4's 17,084 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i7-7820X. L3 cache: 11 MB (total) on the Core i7-7820X vs 25 MB on the Xeon E5-2689 v4.

Feature	Core i7-7820X	Xeon E5-2689 v4
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	10 / 20+25%
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz+18%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+16%	3.1 GHz
L3 Cache	11 MB (total)	25 MB+127%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2.5 MB+150%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	17,171	17,084

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-7820X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2689 v4 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-7820X	Xeon E5-2689 v4
Socket	LGA2066	LGA2011-3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-7820X was priced at $599, while the Xeon E5-2689 v4 came in at $2723. On launch pricing ($599 vs $2723), Core i7-7820X was $2124 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-7820X delivers 28.7 pts/$ vs 6.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2689 v4 — making the Core i7-7820X the 128.2% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-7820X	Xeon E5-2689 v4
MSRP	$599-78%	$2723
Performance per Dollar	28.7+356%	6.3
Release Date	2017	2016

Search Core i7-7820X on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-2689 v4 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.