Core i7-7820X vs Xeon E5-2680 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-7820X vs Xeon E5-2680 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-7820X vs Xeon E5-2680 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-7820X

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (17,171 vs 17,292).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (11 MB vs 35 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2680 v4, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
❌Launch MSRP is still $599 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2680 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌16.7% higher power demand at 140W vs 120W.

Xeon E5-2680 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅+218.2% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 11 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅Draws 120W instead of 140W, a 20W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-7820X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-7820X better than Xeon E5-2680 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2680 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-7820X is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2680 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 28 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 218.2% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 11 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-7820X is the better buy right now. Core i7-7820X comes in at an unclear MSRP at $599 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2680 v4 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.7% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (28.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-7820X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-7820X vs Xeon E5-2680 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-7820X

The Core i7-7820X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 17,171 points. Launch price was $599.

Xeon E5-2680 v4

The Xeon E5-2680 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB. L2 cache: 3.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 17,292 points. Launch price was $1,745.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-7820X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2680 v4 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon E5-2680 v4 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i7-7820X versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2680 v4 — a 30.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-7820X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i7-7820X uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2680 v4 uses Broadwell-EP (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-7820X scores 17,171 against the Xeon E5-2680 v4's 17,292 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon E5-2680 v4. L3 cache: 11 MB (total) on the Core i7-7820X vs 35 MB on the Xeon E5-2680 v4.

Feature	Core i7-7820X	Xeon E5-2680 v4
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	14 / 28+75%
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz+36%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+50%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	11 MB (total)	35 MB+218%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	3.5 MB+250%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)	Broadwell-EP (2016)
PassMark	17,171	17,292

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-7820X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2680 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.