Core i7-840QM
VS
Core i5-655K

Core i7-840QM vs Core i5-655K

Intel

Core i7-840QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Core i5-655K

2 Cores4 Thrd73 WWMax: 3.46 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-840QM is positioned at rank 812 and the Core i5-655K is on rank 1004, so the Core i7-840QM offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-840QM

#799
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1232%
#800
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1214%
#801
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1114%
#802
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1109%
#803
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1099%
#805
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1061%
#806
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1018%
#807
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1016%
#808
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
989%
#811
Athlon II Neo K345
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
100%
#812
Core i7-840QM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#817
Core i7-8709G
MSRP: $338|Avg: $150
99%
#818
Celeron M 560
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
98%
#823
Celeron Dual-Core T3000
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
94%
#824
Pentium P6100
MSRP: $100|Avg: $16.39
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-655K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
33374%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
31535%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
22897%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
6898%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
5464%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
4780%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2738%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2702%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2460%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2460%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2432%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2367%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2334%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2324%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2303%
#1004
Core i5-655K
MSRP: $216|Avg: $55
100%
#1005
Celeron 450
MSRP: $53|Avg: $5
100%
#1006
Core 2 Duo E4600
MSRP: $133|Avg: $9.6
99%
#1008
Core i7-870S
MSRP: $300|Avg: $80
99%
#1009
Core 2 Duo E6540
MSRP: $163|Avg: $15
98%
#1010
Celeron 430
MSRP: $49|Avg: $10
98%
#1011
Athlon X2 BE-2300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $80
97%
#1012
Core i7-875K
MSRP: $353|Avg: $175
96%
#1013
Core i5-670
MSRP: $284|Avg: $100
96%
#1014
Core i5-680
MSRP: $294|Avg: $10
95%
#1015
Core 2 Duo E4300
MSRP: $113|Avg: $5
95%
#1017
Core 2 Duo E4500
MSRP: $133|Avg: $10
94%
#1019
Core 2 Duo E7600
MSRP: $133|Avg: $50
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i5-655K leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i7-840QM is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.4% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i7-840QMCore i5-655K
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($55)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Clarksfield (2009−2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Clarkdale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i7-840QMCore i5-655K
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($55)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-840QM and Core i5-655K

Intel

Core i7-840QM

The Core i7-840QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarksfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,025 points. Launch price was $568.

Intel

Core i5-655K

The Core i5-655K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,017 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i7-840QM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i5-655K offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i7-840QM has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-840QM versus 3.46 GHz on the Core i5-655K — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-655K (base: 1.86 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-840QM uses the Clarksfield (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-655K uses Clarkdale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-840QM scores 2,025 against the Core i5-655K's 2,017 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i7-840QM. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 390 vs 560, a 35.8% lead for the Core i5-655K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,050 vs 1,250 (17.4% advantage for the Core i5-655K). L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-840QM vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i5-655K.

FeatureCore i7-840QMCore i5-655K
Cores / Threads
4 / 8+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz
3.46 GHz+8%
Base Clock
1.86 GHz
3.2 GHz+72%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)+100%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
45 nm
32 nm-29%
Architecture
Clarksfield (2009−2010)
Clarkdale (2010−2011)
PassMark
2,025
2,017
Geekbench 6 Single
390
560+44%
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,050
1,250+19%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-840QM uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-655K uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The Core i5-655K supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: PM55,HM55,QM57,HM57 (Core i7-840QM) and H55,H57,P55 (Core i5-655K).

FeatureCore i7-840QMCore i5-655K
Socket
PGA988
LGA1156
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
16 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i5-655K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-840QM) vs VT-x (Core i5-655K). The Core i5-655K includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Westmere)), while the Core i7-840QM requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-840QM targets Laptop, Core i5-655K targets Desktop.

FeatureCore i7-840QMCore i5-655K
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Westmere)
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x
Target Use
Laptop
Desktop