Core i7-8559U vs EPYC 8324PN

Core i7-8559U vs EPYC 8324PN Performance Spectrum

Core i7-8559U

4 / 8

8,274

0.0%

8,375

+1.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-8559U vs EPYC 8324PN FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-8559U vs EPYC 8324PN: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-8559U

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 130W, a 102W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 8324PN across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (8,274 vs 8,375).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 8324PN, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads.
❌Older platform position on FCBGA1528 with DDR4, while EPYC 8324PN moves to SP6 and DDR5.

EPYC 8324PN

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads.
✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1528 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌364.3% higher power demand at 130W vs 28W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 8324PN better than Core i7-8559U?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 8324PN makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-8559U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 8324PN is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a clear cache advantage at 128 MB versus 8 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 8324PN is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 1500% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 8324PN still makes the most sense overall. EPYC 8324PN comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 8324PN makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2018), a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA1528, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 128 MB L3 cache instead of 8 MB, and more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 4/8. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-8559U vs EPYC 8324PN Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-8559U

The Core i7-8559U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,274 points. Launch price was $431.

EPYC 8324PN

The EPYC 8324PN is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.05 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 8,375 points. Launch price was $2,125.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-8559U packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the EPYC 8324PN offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 8324PN has 28 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i7-8559U versus 3 GHz on the EPYC 8324PN — a 40% clock advantage for the Core i7-8559U (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.05 GHz). The Core i7-8559U uses the Coffee Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the EPYC 8324PN uses Siena (2023−2024) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-8559U scores 8,274 against the EPYC 8324PN's 8,375 — a 1.2% lead for the EPYC 8324PN. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-8559U vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8324PN.

Feature	Core i7-8559U	EPYC 8324PN
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	32 / 64+700%
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz+50%	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+32%	2.05 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	128 MB (total)+1500%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	5 nm-64%
Architecture	Coffee Lake-U (2018−2019)	Siena (2023−2024)
PassMark	8,274	8,375+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-8559U uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the EPYC 8324PN uses SP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.