
Core i7-3960X
Popular choices:

Core i7-8559U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-3960X
2011Why buy it
- ✅+1.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-8559U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $999 MSRP, while Core i7-8559U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌364.3% higher power demand at 130W vs 28W.
Core i7-8559U
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 130W, a 102W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,274 vs 8,402).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 15 MB).
Core i7-3960X
2011Core i7-8559U
2018Why buy it
- ✅+1.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 130W, a 102W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-8559U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $999 MSRP, while Core i7-8559U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌364.3% higher power demand at 130W vs 28W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,274 vs 8,402).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 15 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-8559U better than Core i7-3960X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-3960X | Core i7-8559U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-3960X | Core i7-8559U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 207 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 150 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 208 FPS | 207 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 207 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 124 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-3960X | Core i7-8559U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 207 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 210 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 207 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 210 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 207 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 210 FPS | 207 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-3960X | Core i7-8559U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 207 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 210 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 207 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 210 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 207 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 210 FPS | 207 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-3960X and Core i7-8559U

Core i7-3960X
Core i7-3960X
The Core i7-3960X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,402 points. Launch price was $861.

Core i7-8559U
Core i7-8559U
The Core i7-8559U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,274 points. Launch price was $431.
Processing Power
The Core i7-3960X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i7-8559U offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-3960X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-3960X versus 4.5 GHz on the Core i7-8559U — a 14.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-8559U (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i7-3960X uses the Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-8559U uses Coffee Lake-U (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3960X scores 8,402 against the Core i7-8559U's 8,274 — a 1.5% lead for the Core i7-3960X. L3 cache: 15 MB (total) on the Core i7-3960X vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-8559U.
| Feature | Core i7-3960X | Core i7-8559U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 4.5 GHz+15% |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+22% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 15 MB (total)+88% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) | Coffee Lake-U (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 8,402+2% | 8,274 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 658 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 4,973 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-3960X uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-8559U uses FCBGA1528 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-3960X | Core i7-8559U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | FCBGA1528 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 4 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 40 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Core i7-3960X) / not specified (Core i7-8559U).
| Feature | Core i7-3960X | Core i7-8559U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













